It is quite amazing - we are at the foot of the table, where we have been for a fair chunk of the season - yet some people continue to look for excuses for under performing, inadequate players. I agree it may be unfair to single out individuals - but it ios the fact that peopl still try to claim that Boldewijn is some sort of class act that grates with the rest of us.
Boldewijn has been pretty cr@p for most of the season! He has the odd flourish in the odd game and he scores an occasional spectacular goal. His output for 90 mins on a pitch is absolutely dreadful. His failure to take people on, beat a man, use his pace, get accurate crosses in, create meaningful chances & trouble the keeper, (regardless of which side of the pitch he plays on,) makes him a liability/luxury tbh. Of course he's inconsistent, he's a L2 player, and an average one at best - not the aspiring Championship star some try to make out.
I remember reading tosh about how we would improve when him and Tootle were fit again, how, "if we play him in the right place" we'll be fine etc etc. He's in the right place - on the pitch, with a ball at his feet - and he's fairly useless. Will it take relegation and another dire season for it to dawn on some that Boldewijn is actually not the player they believe he is/was? Yes, he could be more effective in a better side with more pace and mobility around him, that is for sure. Our problem is that we rely on him for the pace and mobility & he fails to deliver far too often.
Our team of "old men" regularly struggle against younger, stronger, fitter opposition. Teams have learned to put 2 men in midfield to counter Doyle and O'Brien - Morecambe did it very effectively for example (Vaughan not O'Brien on that day) - and we have nothing up front to trouble half decent defenders.
Totally agree about poor management and coaching - successive regimes have failed to produce any decent quality, consistency or indeed entertainment out of this bunch. Incredible really.