+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 85

Thread: Aberdeen Shareholders

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,335

    Aberdeen Shareholders

    Thoughts on this recent development?

    http://bit.ly/2EZ5Lt7

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6,541
    I really dont like the way our Club is being run...these seem like Dave King type tactics to me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,943
    The multi multi millionaires who are desperate for the new stadium are looking for further investment from others to realise their Kingsford dream. No one should be helping them out financially as they themselves have more than enough funds to see their dream through.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,200
    Quote Originally Posted by redscot View Post
    I really dont like the way our Club is being run...these seem like Dave King type tactics to me.
    Actually no. Its the total opposite of that.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    30,497
    Can't do anything but laugh

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,699
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    Thoughts on this recent development?

    http://bit.ly/2EZ5Lt7
    It reads to me that one particular shareholder would own over 30% of the total shares in the club, should he provide £2m of capital required to complete the training facility, and would then, by public limited company law rules, have to make an offer for the other shares in AFC, and that person (Cormack?) doesn’t wish to do so, hence the move to a private limited company, where that rule doesn’t exist.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,335
    The money was in place for the training facility though. Surely if it wasn’t, they would’ve mentioned it at the transparency Q&A the other week?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    The money was in place for the training facility though. Surely if it wasn’t, they would’ve mentioned it at the transparency Q&A the other week?
    That’s why not one of us can trust our main shareholders.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,699
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    The money was in place for the training facility though. Surely if it wasn’t, they would’ve mentioned it at the transparency Q&A the other week?
    Exactly. The pant pishers will read today’s news and think we are £2m short but in reality, the extra dough is there and waiting and this is simply a paper exercise to prevent Cormack ( I assume) from having to make an offer for the other 70% of shares.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    465
    Quote Originally Posted by Feck_the_Huns View Post
    Exactly. The pant pishers will read today’s news and think we are £2m short but in reality, the extra dough is there and waiting and this is simply a paper exercise to prevent Cormack ( I assume) from having to make an offer for the other 70% of shares.
    Going from public limited company to a private limited company is a bit more than a paper exercise.

    I'm no sure about all the name-calling - happy clappers, pant pishers etc - but the point you make about the extra (extra?) dough being there and waiting does, in fact, merely confirm that it is NOT there and immediately available. It also raises the question about how we can pay for the new stadium.

    I've just checked. My pants are not yet pished - but at my age one has to be continually vigilant. Neither are my hands clapping happily.

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •