+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 85

Thread: Aberdeen Shareholders

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,325

    Aberdeen Shareholders

    Thoughts on this recent development?

    http://bit.ly/2EZ5Lt7

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6,541
    I really dont like the way our Club is being run...these seem like Dave King type tactics to me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,943
    The multi multi millionaires who are desperate for the new stadium are looking for further investment from others to realise their Kingsford dream. No one should be helping them out financially as they themselves have more than enough funds to see their dream through.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    30,497
    Can't do anything but laugh

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,699
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    Thoughts on this recent development?

    http://bit.ly/2EZ5Lt7
    It reads to me that one particular shareholder would own over 30% of the total shares in the club, should he provide £2m of capital required to complete the training facility, and would then, by public limited company law rules, have to make an offer for the other shares in AFC, and that person (Cormack?) doesn’t wish to do so, hence the move to a private limited company, where that rule doesn’t exist.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,325
    The money was in place for the training facility though. Surely if it wasn’t, they would’ve mentioned it at the transparency Q&A the other week?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    8,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    The money was in place for the training facility though. Surely if it wasn’t, they would’ve mentioned it at the transparency Q&A the other week?
    That’s why not one of us can trust our main shareholders.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    21,494
    Far better off being a private limited company.

    Unless of course you want to buy and sell your shares at will.

    I am not a shareholder and don't pay the slightest attention to AFC share price but I strongly suspect that the vast majority of small shareholders own their shares for sentimental reasons and wouldn't consider selling them.
    The bigger shareholders will wheel and deal amongst themselves either way.

    Actually, I'm surprised AFC ever took the risk of being a Public Limited Company, far better off out of it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,699
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    The money was in place for the training facility though. Surely if it wasn’t, they would’ve mentioned it at the transparency Q&A the other week?
    Exactly. The pant pishers will read today’s news and think we are £2m short but in reality, the extra dough is there and waiting and this is simply a paper exercise to prevent Cormack ( I assume) from having to make an offer for the other 70% of shares.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,325
    Name:  9A23F9A3-6201-4B78-93ED-37D05B7317F7.png
Views: 1389
Size:  8.4 KB

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •