Got a feeling a lot of the funding needed to run a youth academy is provided by the football league, and this funding would therefore now cease
Thanks. This was an interesting quote on the Norwich website:
“Basford are a club that gives lads from the area a second chance. They were very accommodating when we approached them, and we thank them for allowing Kole to come and spend some time with us here before signing."
It's always tempting to look at a team like Crewe as a potential role model when it comes to developing youth. But there's a reason they are one of the few teams who do it successfully - because it's so difficult and you are only as good as your latest batch of players and how long you can hold onto them (hence, I assume, Crewe's fluctuating fortunes over the years).
Crewe Alexandra continue to survive, and sporadically succeed, with a squad heavily populated by youth products. I think the difference from many clubs is that they are willing to throw their kids in at the deep end much earlier and be patient while they literally learn to become professional footballers, which means taking a few big defeats along the way. Most clubs tend to hide behind the excuse that that their youngsters "aren't quite ready yet" or that they "don't want to throw them in at this time", whereas Crewe just do it. Some of their players go on to play at a higher level, while others stick around, but the club continues to compete despite a relatively tiny budget, and they've always played attractive football.