Get your very own personalised DAN'S DOMAIN gifts!
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Perez

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    1,905

    Perez

    Been discussed about him leaving on another thread,but 30m would be a cracking deal if it didn't go straight to Ashley.
    By the way,its still 7/2 for relegation.House on it and all that.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    16,777
    I read that it was 16 mil?

    But, whatever the price, fatso will have it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    1,905
    Lee Ryder reckons it will go into the transfer kitty.Nearly spilt my drink.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    12,567
    Could we get a better player for 16 million? I don't think so these days. Remember Rondon is only that price because of his contract and if you take Perez away will be be as effective?

    Not that I matters as we have no Rondon and soon no Perez anyway.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    270
    16m is sh|t business

    Giving him away

    Like milner back in the day

    The man is not a business man he's a stack sh|te high flog it cheap mongrel.

    Doesn't know the value of anything rafa, players, SJP , fans.

    Needs a bullet the fat ****

  6. #6

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    4,454
    There's plenty of time to add players and to sell players.
    Very few clubs have done much business. The odd signing for some.
    I'm sure we'll have some in the pipeline as well as some outgoings as per usual.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by ghostrider View Post
    There's plenty of time to add players and to sell players.
    Very few clubs have done much business. The odd signing for some.
    I'm sure we'll have some in the pipeline as well as some outgoings as per usual.
    We haven't even got a manager FFS!

    I have feck all faith in Charnley getting targets over the line.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    16,777
    So far this week fatso has got rid of our manager* and top goalscorer

    *let's not pretend Rafa had a genuine choice about whether or not to stay.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    1,905
    So Rafas wages,Perez gone,next Longstaff,there is the money he paid out to buy GAME.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7,838
    No sale of any 1st team regular is good business... at any price...

    We have no feckin squad and we are being asset stripped.....

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by ghostrider View Post
    There's plenty of time to add players and to sell players.
    Very few clubs have done much business. The odd signing for some.
    I'm sure we'll have some in the pipeline as well as some outgoings as per usual.
    Your fishing is as poor as Ashley's running of the club here mind

    Getting lazy Ghost

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    4,454
    Quote Originally Posted by Geordie_Exile_De View Post
    We haven't even got a manager FFS!

    I have feck all faith in Charnley getting targets over the line.
    That fair enough if you don't have faith but the thing is, we do get them.
    However , we have to have a new manager in with their own ideas and also having to look at what the club have identified.
    I believe we'll get targets over the line.
    Like I said, very few clubs have done much business as it stands.
    We need a manager in quick, who can basically hit the ground running.

    Only time will tell.
    We have to be sure of a takeover or not a takeover and naturally see what transpires from there.
    It only takes a couple of targets and we're on the level.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    8,598
    Ashley was quoted as saying it was the Arabs that didn't want Rafa.

    If that was the case then surely they would have said don't sell any assets until the takeover is complete and we have our manager in place.

    I get more cynical about a takeover daily.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,828
    Quote Originally Posted by ghostrider View Post
    That fair enough if you don't have faith but the thing is, we do get them.
    However , we have to have a new manager in with their own ideas and also having to look at what the club have identified.
    I believe we'll get targets over the line.
    Like I said, very few clubs have done much business as it stands.
    We need a manager in quick, who can basically hit the ground running.

    Only time will tell.
    We have to be sure of a takeover or not a takeover and naturally see what transpires from there.
    It only takes a couple of targets and we're on the level.
    Oh how insightful...we get it, you don't really care and what will be will be.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    4,454
    30 million for a player that wanted to leave before and hankered to leave , as well as getting booed before being let off the leash to rescue his below par season, is excellent business.
    It'll be fantastic business if we replace him with better.
    Leicester have got a good player and I have no ill will against Perez.

    However, we move on just like we always do and like all clubs do.
    Nothing lasts for too long in this game, as we all know.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,828
    Quote Originally Posted by ghostrider View Post
    30 million for a player that wanted to leave before and hankered to leave , as well as getting booed before being let off the leash to rescue his below par season, is excellent business.
    It'll be fantastic business if we replace him with better.
    Leicester have got a good player and I have no ill will against Perez.

    However, we move on just like we always do and like all clubs do.
    Nothing lasts for too long in this game, as we all know.
    It is good business on the face of it.

    The problem is...will the new manager actually see this 30m? They don't usually.

    He's going to need it as apart from improving our squad...he now has to basically replace all our goals from last season.

    Oh, happy days...

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    4,454
    I believe a new manager will receive it...and more.
    This is why I argue over the net spend situation.

    Perez cost us something like 1.2 million (approx) and yet, if we get 30 million for him then it's a near 29 million profit.
    However, that money will be sitting in the coffers, so if we go out and spend ,say, 32 million on two players (as an instance) then we've spent 32 million, not 3 million and all the stingy gets under the sun, tag.

    If we spend 3 million and nothing else then I could well understand uproar.

    Net spends mean nothing. What counts is how you barter and how you spend in relation to what you can uphold to keep continuity...or basically keep a big club afloat.
    Last edited by ghostrider; 03-07-2019 at 11:12 AM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,828
    Quote Originally Posted by ghostrider View Post
    30 million for a player that wanted to leave before and hankered to leave , as well as getting booed before being let off the leash to rescue his below par season, is excellent business.
    It'll be fantastic business if we replace him with better.
    Leicester have got a good player and I have no ill will against Perez.

    However, we move on just like we always do and like all clubs do.
    Nothing lasts for too long in this game, as we all know.
    Quote Originally Posted by ghostrider View Post
    I believe a new manager will receive it...and more.
    This is why I argue over the net spend situation.

    Perez cost us something like 1.2 million (approx) and yet, if we get 30 million for him then it's a near 29 million profit.
    However, that money will be sitting in the coffers, so if we go out and spend ,say, 32 million on two players (as an instance) then we've spent 32 million, not 3 million and all the stingy gets under the sun, tag.

    If we spend 3 million and nothing else then I could well understand uproar.

    Net spends mean nothing. What counts is how you barter and how you spend in relation to what you can uphold to keep continuity...or basically keep a big club afloat.
    If we were to only spend 32m in this window then net spend would absolutely be relevant you moron.

    You are right that net spend is not always the be all and end all of any argument involving investment. It does happen to have a baring on our plight however.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    4,454
    Quote Originally Posted by usedtobeshearer View Post
    If we were to only spend 32m in this window then net spend would absolutely be relevant.
    I never said it wasn't relevant. Read what I said.

    Quote Originally Posted by usedtobeshearer View Post
    You are right that net spend is not always the be all and end all of any argument involving investment. It does happen to have a baring on our plight however.
    It doesn't need to have any bearing on any plight if a club manages to run on player bartering.
    However, it's not always easy to keep up consistently, which we generally don't and do actually net spend when required. It just seems to be overlooked or cast off as minimal whilst outgoing transfer monies are simply classed as not part of a spend.

    Take a look at many clubs and you'll find a lot of them ride along on player outgoing fees to cater for their incomers, even at mammoth prices that makes it look like they're spending big cash from the hip.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •