Did they?
Back when Scardino needed a guarantor (not the money) for the 2mil loan he agreed to buy the club the city council said it “wasn’t willing to risk taxpayers money”, just a few years after lending our (not in the city area) red neighbours over 5 times that (which the defaulted on payment of a number of times) to improve their stadium.
They then charged the HG trust the full amount payable on the lease for the ground despite knowing it was for the survival of the club.
In more recent timed they have done NOTHING to help or assist in our recent crisis. Where even local MP’s have been involved.
The council would rather see us gone so they can redevelop the area, so thank god for the HG trust.
It would be easier I agree but it's not out of the question.
On a slightly separate but interesting note. Bury have now also been excluded from the FA Cup and the FA are having discussions going forward as to how that impacts the first round proper.
It may seem crass, but one thing that spring to mind was as the highest placed relegated team, we might get a bye or taken straight into the first round proper so we don't have a qualifying round to make up the numbers? The way forward would be to have one more non league team in that round regardless you'd think anyway even if it doesn't impact Notts. Just goes to show the wider impact clubs have
It's said to see Bury expelled from the league, and yes, it could have been us. But it wasn't, and one of the reasons is our unique history. People always say that counts for nothing, but yet another buyer of our club has quoted it as one of the reasons for buying us. Bury had history, although they weren't founder members, but only one club can be the oldest.
Now, if Bolton get expelled, and they were founder members, people will sit up and take notice, even the dribbling fools at the FA who are old enough to rmember when Bolton were good.
Bury are/were a small club as league outfits go and have been a poorly supported club for some time, they only scraped past the 4k mark last season despite being promoted, that's less than half of what the other two auto promoted sides (Lincoln and MK) averaged.
And yet, up until the 1970s, they'd only ever spent 5 seasons out of the top 2 tiers, so this probably feels more of a shock to older football fans than the majority of us who see Bury as no bigger than a Colchester, Crewe or Rochdale (and barely bigger than the likes of Darlington, Aldershot, Chester and Hereford). I'm guessing the success of the Manchester clubs, just as television arrived, had a big impact on their ability to maintain a healthy support base and compete in the upper levels.
The 12 point deduction couldn't have helped to convince any potential buyer to take on the debts as you'd be looking at a season where you're probably not going to have anything to realistically play for, gates will be lower than ever and the opportunity for 'new owner bounce' is lost. As a supporter I'd rather take a straight relegation as punishment. Points deductions should be scrapped, it undermines the integrity of the competition, as we saw when Fword got auto promoted despite being the 3rd best club based on results behind Leeds.
That's exactly the reason they are bitter. We were relegated because we were one of the worst two teams in the division, they missed out on promotion because they weren't good enough to make the top three or win the playoffs. We deserve to be in the National League, Mansfield deserve to be in League 2. Gloating at Bury's demise does them no credit at all.