+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 117

Thread: pride park sale

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    6,523
    If the EFL believe that we sold assets at an artificially high profit, then they should investigate us getting £ 1.8 million for Rowett rather than the surplus on the ground. The former was the greater mark up on value

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,490
    And the 4m we got for a rookie manager with a years experience

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,458
    ...plus however much we got for an assistant manager and a 1st team coach

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,783
    We're bandits

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,651
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    I'd hope so too. The gain on sale was not the sale price, but the excess of the sale price over the written down value at the time of sale. Assets disposed of during the year to June 2018 include property with an original cost of £ 56.2 million as well as a couple of million in fixtures fittings and construction in progress. Depreciation already charged was £ 14.5 million on property and £ 16.4 million on total assets.

    Thus net book value of property sold was £ 41.4 million, and of other assets (presumably included in the stadium) was£ 1 million.

    The profit on disposal of the ground was £ 39.9 million

    Thus the building was sold for £ 81.3 million, or £ some £ 82 million including fixtures and fittings inside it


    Basically it was sold for double its book value, but only at a premium of £ 24 million over gross cost/valuation at the time of sale. This latter figure probably includes a recent revaluation, as the original build cost was substantially less than this, but I cant be arsed to trawl back to find when that £ 56m valuation was last done.

    FYI the operating loss for last year was £ 31 million, offset by the sale of PP (£ 40m) the sale of players (£ 3.7m) and the disposal of Rowett (£ 1.8 million) giving a £ 14.5 overall profit
    Geoff it was independently called at 55million in 2007 and it's in the 2008 accounts

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,458
    In a topic on the subject of the FA investigation elsewhere on tinterweb thingy a poster informed us that "A complaint led by the DYS calling it a financial wrong doing to get around the FFP rules" was the catalyst to the FA looking at the situation again.

    You know that same DYS that went into insolvency in 2004 owing money to all and sundry and paying nobody, became reborn, and then went into administration in 2007 owing money yet again and to have the second coming with a board reshuffle and a different parent company name but without paying the debts incurred yet again. Both occasions due to overspending on players and wages.
    Convenient short memories?

    Such a great bunch of pillocks those folk from that part of Yarksher.......

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    6,523
    Quote Originally Posted by mistaram View Post
    Geoff it was independently called at 55million in 2007 and it's in the 2008 accounts
    Cheers, saves me hunting it down. 10 years ago 56m, today 82m. More plausible. But that was when we had our year in the PL so that would have probably pushed value up a bit back then with talk of an extra tier added and bigger revenue generating capability in PL.

    Value has very little to do with original build cost, but is more related to net present value of expected future revenue streams derived from the asset. As of today I reckon its going down!!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,490
    Any news anywhere on who was the independent valuer?

    Graham Penny maybe, is just a guess I have no idea who it was but if it was him/them then I'll start to worry as they aren't really that independent from DCFC

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,458
    Quote Originally Posted by StensonRam View Post
    Any news anywhere on who was the independent valuer?

    Graham Penny maybe, is just a guess I have no idea who it was but if it was him/them then I'll start to worry as they aren't really that independent from DCFC
    In for a Penny might cost us a pound?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,651
    Quote Originally Posted by Geoff Parkstone View Post
    Cheers, saves me hunting it down. 10 years ago 56m, today 82m. More plausible. But that was when we had our year in the PL so that would have probably pushed value up a bit back then with talk of an extra tier added and bigger revenue generating capability in PL.

    Value has very little to do with original build cost, but is more related to net present value of expected future revenue streams derived from the asset. As of today I reckon its going down!!
    Yes we've got restaurants and bars now that we never had in 2007,

Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •