In that instance it was still Considine error, but the “conditions” did play a part in his misjudgement.
Still, it gives you something to know on time and again and again and again and again........
in that instance it was still considine error, but the “conditions” did play a part in his misjudgement.
Still, it gives you something to know on time and again and again and again and again........
In that instance it was still Considine error, but the “conditions” did play a part in his misjudgement.
Still, it gives you something to know on time and again and again and again and again........
Which goal was down to the conditions?
The St Johnstone game where he let Shaugnessy out jump him or the 3-2 Livingston game where he mistimed yet another header?
Here’s hoping the injured defenders are back before winter.
Well, the direction the ball’s going clearly changes just at the point when Considine puts in his challenge , and it looks to me as if that’s down to Considine getting a touch on the ball.
Maybe it was the conditions made the ball change direction.
Well, the direction the ball’s going clearly changes just at the point when Considine puts in his challenge , and it looks to me as if that’s down to Considine getting a touch on the ball.
Maybe it was the conditions made the ball change direction.
I'm sure McInnes would have said something about it not being a penalty then...
Well, the direction the ball’s going clearly changes just at the point when Considine puts in his challenge , and it looks to me as if that’s down to Considine getting a touch on the ball.
Maybe it was the conditions made the ball change direction.
The Hearts player takes a touch to move it away from Considine.
Probably because he saw Considine flying in and if he took a touch it would be a penalty.
The guy was going nowhere so there was no need to slide in like that.