What a prize f00kwit

[WTF11]

https://www.footballinsider247.com/s...er-leeds-news/

[Billyni]

Bent by name and...................

Also include Alfie and the Darby person who sleeps with the sheep.

[Rev72]

F*ck him!

[norfolk white]

Stupid ****

[UbiqueLUFC33]

Awwww bless. He's obviously farming around for work as a pundit. Sky seem to employ just about any hasbeen fcukwit with a big mouth and little brain these days so he should fit in nicely.

[wortleygirl]

Complete and utter tosspot.

In case the silly prat forgot...we did not actually break any rules and it was only Fat Franks constant bleating along with some pathetic club chairmen's moaning that we got fined.

[Silentman]

Thick as f00k, can't understand that the award is for that single act against Villa, it's not a general award for 'being fair', but as I say thick as f00k....

[Pacaman]

Bent is an idiot gob****e at best. Bringing the game into disrepute in such a way warrants a hefty ban and a very serious financial fine. Same applies to Lawrence. Surely a worse misdemeanour than so called Spy-gate but will the EFL do owt? Unlikely they will find a rule that has been broken.🤣

[MadAmster]

Complete and utter tosspot.

In case the silly prat forgot...we did not actually break any rules and it was only Fat Franks constant bleating along with some pathetic club chairmen's moaning that we got fined.

I have to disagree with you on that. Prior to last season starting all clubs were issued with new guidelines on, among other things, sportsmanship and ethics. It was these new guidelines the EFL decided Leeds had broken. If I remember correctly, LUFC plead guilty to the charge or didn't contest the charge at any rate.

This isn't meant as red rag to a bull just to upset Leeds fans, merely an outlining of fact. Before anybody has a go at me for it, read my posts on this forum on the stupidity that occurred last Tuesday evening on the roads just outside Derby. I am in agreement with most of what has been written on this board over it.

[LeedsFTW]

I have to disagree with you on that. Prior to last season starting all clubs were issued with new guidelines on, among other things, sportsmanship and ethics. It was these new guidelines the EFL decided Leeds had broken. If I remember correctly, LUFC plead guilty to the charge or didn't contest the charge at any rate.

This isn't meant as red rag to a bull just to upset Leeds fans, merely an outlining of fact. Before anybody has a go at me for it, read my posts on this forum on the stupidity that occurred last Tuesday evening on the roads just outside Derby. I am in agreement with most of what has been written on this board over it.

Playing devils advocate, I don't think any club should be observing another's training session, regardless of it being allowed or not. However I will always maintain that Leeds broke no rules, other clubs do it all the time and we only played along with the fine and punishment to prevent the vindictive EFL from trying to impose a much harsher punishment.

What annoys me most, is that people conveniently forget, that Derby ran to the media with a lot of false information before they even contacted the EFL. Leeds were given the option by the EFL to bring charges against Derby for the way they acted i.e. trying to prejudice opinion and influence proceedings. Leeds declined to have Derby charged.