Originally Posted by
KerrAvon
Thomas Cook wanted the government to give them a £200m loan, to exerrt pressure upon other lenders (for which read, RBS) to participate in loaning them a further £900 million and to underwrite those further loans.
The government was right to say no. Thomas Cook was simply not viable. It was sitting on a massive and rapidly growing £1.7bn of debt. Accepting the company's request would have simply created an open ended commitment to prop up a lame duck that had no prospect of turning it's fortunes around. It would also have set a precedent for other poorly run and non-viable companies in the future.
Thomas Cook got into trouble by expanding far too rapidly and aggressively and not adapting to changing market demands.