We're being cast in a negative light yet again as being an ungrateful and unrealistic set of fans because we haven't taken to Bruce in the same way we did Rafa. Apparently we should be over the moon with how things are given where we are in the League and have no right to complain about anything.

Well I beg to differ. Aye, ultimately it's a game about results and it's hard to argue that we're doing better-points wise-than many of us thought we would at the beginning of the season. But, how we're getting those points is a big issue for me. Is this really what we want? Less than 30% possession in most matches and being compared to Wimbledon of old...lumping the ball forward for a lone, battering ram striker? Is it not about entertainment too? You don't have to have free-flowing, attacking, front-foot football a la Man City to be entertained. Much as some of our early season games under Rafa were shocking at times, the football after Christmas was exiting to watch as we counter-attacked with pace and purpose, scoring something like the 5th most goals in the League from that point on. It was definitely entertaining. The turgid drivel we've got to endure this season isn't counter-attacking football, it's hoof-ball and it's piss poor to watch.

So-where does the balance lie? is anyone interested in results on their own or would you rather see us take more risks by trying to, well, play a little bit more?