+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Ben Wiles

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    4,366
    Quote Originally Posted by fc_miller View Post
    Also, why play 2 players out of position, he has played Wiles out on the left midfield before, so no reason why not to play him at left back. Plus Ogbene and Olosunde, are starting to form a good relationship and the more they play the stronger the understanding between the two will be.
    Yes, I agree, I would have started with Olosunde at right back and Ben at left back but I’m not picking the team.
    He soon changed it to our advantage.
    The sooner Thompson and Jones come back the better for me.
    More competition for starting places the better.
    Thompson is also a stand out player.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,137
    Quote Originally Posted by rolymiller View Post
    Yep not denying he did well in an unfamiliar position. It made sense to bring on Lyndsey to help him out.

    Cayton, I think Wiles may be on subs bench because I think the new lad will be on the wing.
    I've followed Wiles' career through the Millers juniors and reserves - never saw him playing on the wing (or at full back) at those levels. Thought Wiles tried hard in wide midfield, but didn't look great. It is not fair of Warney to keep playing him out of position, and with Mattock back, we have to play the players in their specialist roles. Worth having Wiles on the bench though , because if one of the defenders gets injured or sent off again (let's hope not!), we will need him back on the field again
    Last edited by mikemiller; 13-01-2020 at 10:53 PM.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    Quote Originally Posted by mikemiller View Post
    I've followed Wiles' career through the Millers juniors and reserves - never saw him playing on the wing (or at full back) at those levels. Thought Wiles tried hard in wide midfield, but didn't look great. It is not fair of Warney to keep playing him out of position, and with Mattock back, we have to play the players in their specialist roles. Worth having Wiles on the bench though , because if one of the defenders gets injured or sent off again (let's hope not!), we will need him back on the field again
    CM’s are doing well together, don’t upset the apple cart unless it’s necessary.
    Sorry Ben but it should be bench for now but I won’t be surprised to see you out wide

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    8,188
    Quote Originally Posted by mikemiller View Post
    I've followed Wiles' career through the Millers juniors and reserves - never saw him playing on the wing (or at full back) at those levels. Thought Wiles tried hard in wide midfield, but didn't look great. It is not fair of Warney to keep playing him out of position, and with Mattock back, we have to play the players in their specialist roles. Worth having Wiles on the bench though , because if one of the defenders gets injured or sent off again (let's hope not!), we will need him back on the field again
    Not fair? What a strange statement. He has players ahead of him for his preferred central midfield role so he isn't going to get selected there. He's a professional footballer so should be able to adapt to other positions if required. If he can't do that he will be on the bench which will probably be the case on Saturday.
    I like Ben and think he shows potential but he needs to improve a lot if he is to dislodge Barlaser or Crooks from central midfield so he'll have to knuckle down and get used to playing elsewhere if selected. The team is more important than any individual.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    5,184
    Chances will come along in CM area soon enough. It will be up to Wiles to grab the chance when he can. Patience and determination is needed.
    He’s massively improved over the last year but still has a bit to go.

  6. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by millertop View Post
    So if he turned out to be bad like you thought would you have blamed Warney? 😉
    I'm fairly sure Warne picks the team so who else would you blame ?
    I said it seemed like a bad idea at the time, not that Ben was bad.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Townerslovechild View Post
    I'm fairly sure Warne picks the team so who else would you blame ?
    I said it seemed like a bad idea at the time, not that Ben was bad.
    Exactly but you seem to have a problems with others who might blame Warney.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    334
    Quote Originally Posted by CASPER-64-FRANK View Post
    Depends how big a ' mate ' Hakeeb is with Paul...

    Joe Mattock to left back.

    Barring injuries centre mid has to be Dan Barlaser and Matt Crooks.
    Difficult decision to leave Ben out, that's what PW gets paid for...making decisions.
    I think that's right Casper. It's easy to forget that Ben is still a developing player and requires a bit of nurturing. Bench duty is no punishment as the likes of him, Lindsay, Ladapo, Hastie etc. give it a very strong look. Barlaser and Crooks to stay.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    6,588
    Barlaser & Lindsay 1st choice for me in midfield. I'm not a Crooks fan from day 1 for us.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    24,741
    Can give the ball away but he was a man mountain at Oxford gwru. If I was a defender id be pretty shyte scared if he came charging at me like a bull in midfield.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •