O/T Prince Charles Tests Positive

[ramAnag]

Thought this was a thread about the extent to which this damned virus can spread through all echelons of society regardless of class, status and privilege.

Not sure why it’s turned into a quarrel about who’s more working class than who, but if you’re really implying that ‘socialism, Marxism, Stalinism and collectivism’ are merely ‘communism’ by any other name then you’re very much mistaken, Tricky.

[swaledale]

Thought this was a thread about the extent to which this damned virus can spread through all echelons of society regardless of class, status and privilege.

Not sure why it’s turned into a quarrel about who’s more working class than who, but if you’re really implying that ‘socialism, Marxism, Stalinism and collectivism’ are merely ‘communism’ by any other name then you’re very much mistaken, Tricky.

The thread title merely says the royal loon has caught it! Not sure that means what you think it means. Anyway its not a quarrel more a debate which has developed through the thread and is relevant unless your a pedant!

[ramAnag]

I must be a pedant then. Fail to see how the PoW catching the virus leads to a debate on Communism but then again...I don’t really see how you can have that debate anyway with someone who believes that the five ‘isms’ referred to are all the same.

What might be of value elsewhere, imo, is a discussion on how this right wing government has rapidly turned to a form of collectivism at the first sign of crisis.

[Geoff Parkstone]

I must be a pedant then. Fail to see how the PoW catching the virus leads to a debate on Communism but then again...I don’t really see how you can have that debate anyway with someone who believes that the five ‘isms’ referred to are all the same.

What might be of value elsewhere, imo, is a discussion on how this right wing government has rapidly turned to a form of collectivism at the first sign of crisis.

So would you rather that the right wing government had just ignored everyone's plight but kept on paying themselves and allowing businesses to go to the wall?

What the government is seeking to do is right and proper - it isn't a political issue and there is no need to try and make it one. Whichever side of the left-right-centre political wall you fall on what is being done is appropriate, although some will argue with the quantum or distribution of governmental largesse, noone can deny it is correct to react this way.

There are too many opportunists out there trying to make political capital, or financial gain, out of the pandemic. There are already scammers trying to con businesses and individuals out of the government support grants, and using the situation as another back story for phishing.

Let us not fall into the trap of trying to politicise what is a pan national battle. It does not become us

[swaledale]

So would you rather that the right wing government had just ignored everyone's plight but kept on paying themselves and allowing businesses to go to the wall?

What the government is seeking to do is right and proper - it isn't a political issue and there is no need to try and make it one. Whichever side of the left-right-centre political wall you fall on what is being done is appropriate, although some will argue with the quantum or distribution of governmental largesse, noone can deny it is correct to react this way.

There are too many opportunists out there trying to make political capital, or financial gain, out of the pandemic. There are already scammers trying to con businesses and individuals out of the government support grants, and using the situation as another back story for phishing.

Let us not fall into the trap of trying to politicise what is a pan national battle. It does not become us

Indeed its a national and global crisis, there may be questions asked as to why the health service is underresourced, why given they did a pandemic readiness test with the NHS a while ago they took no action but currently it has to be a cross political response.

[ramAnag]

So would you rather that the right wing government had just ignored everyone's plight but kept on paying themselves and allowing businesses to go to the wall?

What the government is seeking to do is right and proper - it isn't a political issue and there is no need to try and make it one. Whichever side of the left-right-centre political wall you fall on what is being done is appropriate, although some will argue with the quantum or distribution of governmental largesse, noone can deny it is correct to react this way.

There are too many opportunists out there trying to make political capital, or financial gain, out of the pandemic. There are already scammers trying to con businesses and individuals out of the government support grants, and using the situation as another back story for phishing.

Let us not fall into the trap of trying to politicise what is a pan national battle. It does not become us

Whoa there, GP. It wasn’t a criticism. Just an observation.

There is a lot for us to learn from the current situation.

The role and importance of ‘collectivism’, the importance of a properly funded health service, the crucial role that even the most ‘humble’ employees have to play in our society’s well being, the importance of planning and testing and the need for nations to work together and learn from each other are just a few of them.

No politicising there, just decency and common sense I believe.

Interestingly I heard today how, in Germany, two ‘professional’ people I know who are having to work from home, are also volunteering for to make masks as are many other Germans. Have you heard of that happening here? Me neither.

[Geoff Parkstone]

Whoa there, GP. It wasn’t a criticism. Just an observation.

There is a lot for us to learn from the current situation.

The role and importance of ‘collectivism’, the importance of a properly funded health service, the crucial role that even the most ‘humble’ employees have to play in our society’s well being, the importance of planning and testing and the need for nations to work together and learn from each other are just a few of them.

No politicising there, just decency and common sense I believe.

Interestingly I heard today how, in Germany, two ‘professional’ people I know who are having to work from home, are also volunteering for to make masks as are many other Germans. Have you heard of that happening here? Me neither.

Sort of, yes - there is the story coming out of the royal mint yesterday where staff have designed one and are heading into production now.

Sounded very like politicising to me! If you believe that your "importances" paragraph represent things that we need to learn, I am so depressed. Do you really think no-one knew this before? The only area I would question is your need for disaster planning - I'm sure that the NHS has actually done such planning, but equally sure that they cannot actually fully resource them all upfront within any sensible budget given the number of possible disaster causes ranging from a variety of possible pandemics to nuclear holocaust

[ramAnag]

Sort of, yes - there is the story coming out of the royal mint yesterday where staff have designed one and are heading into production now.

Sounded very like politicising to me! If you believe that your "importances" paragraph represent things that we need to learn, I am so depressed. Do you really think no-one knew this before? The only area I would question is your need for disaster planning - I'm sure that the NHS has actually done such planning, but equally sure that they cannot actually fully resource them all upfront within any sensible budget given the number of possible disaster causes ranging from a variety of possible pandemics to nuclear holocaust

You make a very fair point about ‘disaster planning’. It’s a little like the dilemma we face every winter. People despair when we are caught out by heavy snow but if we spent on the equipment required so it was constantly available it would have been virtually redundant for the last two years.

Having said that, there are things we are currently struggling with because of neglect by government over the last ten years.
The police were struggling before all this because of repeated cuts. Now that they have to monitor idiots who are going out unnecessarily they are struggling even more and God help us if they have to deal with social unrest.
Likewise the NHS are struggling, again because of cuts, and it’s all very well to applaud them one evening and put on a nice ‘lightshow’, but I bet they’d rather have the right protective gear.

More recently the government has, imo, been absurdly slow to react. We have experienced the privilege of weeks of seeing what is happening in far away China along with, much closer to home, Italy and Spain. We have watched the Germans and the Koreans implement their strategy of ‘test, test, test’ which appears to be fundamental in the saving of lives and we have dithered.

Three weeks ago 70,000 people gathered together at Twickenham for a rugby match. Since then the football authorities, NOT the government, have cancelled the social gatherings synonymous with football. We’ve had the handshaking shambles. The...’I’d strongly advise people not to go to pubs, clubs and theatres’ fiasco and now we’re going to all get a letter telling us ‘things are going to get worse before they get better’.
Well no sh*t Sherlock...my doctor used exactly the same phrase in conversation with me four weeks ago!

Doesn’t he realise that he has the whole of the British media to get his message across? Doesn’t he realise that while the vast majority are complying with the ‘lockdown’ those that aren’t are either too arrogant to take notice or simply can’t ‘kin read his letter?

So, am I in agreement with the steps you initially referred to as having been taken by the government. Absolutely...yes.

Am I impressed and do I have confidence in other aspects of its handling of this crisis...absolutely not.

Are we all in this together? It would be nice to think so but I’ll be a lot more convinced when those tests we so desperately need are based on health rather than wealth.

[Andy_Faber]

Harsh, Andy. MP’s and bankers are not on my ‘hit list’ as you call it.

I simply favour a fairer and more equitable society and I’m opposed to those who get in the way of that i.e. bankers of the selfish variety and MP’s who appear more motivated by ego and self interest than anything else.

I recognise the need for both bankers and MP’s, but I do wish the proverbial bar could be raised in terms of those who often occupy those two positions.

P.S. If I did have a ‘hit list’ then those selling hand sanitiser etc at inflated prices, those queuing to park in the Macclesfield Forest this morning and the most irresponsible leader in the World - Trump - would be right at the top. Can see him being gone, one way or another, before much longer.

But your reply shows your bias, MILLIONS 'get away with it' and MPs and bankers are just easy hits. Unfortunately its 'not the done thing' to point the finger at other social groups who transgress, in fact its probably 'not the done thing' to say something as traditional as 'its not the done thing' these days.

[ramAnag]

Tbf, Andy...I’ve been known to criticise the dishonest tax fiddling amongst the self employed and the ‘absurdly overpaid’ footballers before now, so your criticism doesn’t really stand up.

Not entirely sure where you’re coming from on this one.

Bankers, because of their role in the financial crisis of twelve or so years ago, and MP’s because of things like the expenses scandal and there repeated failings are obvious targets. Those who are dishonest in their tax dealings amongst the self employed and footballers who earn more in a week than many earn in a year (or five) are others who get criticised.

You’re probably right, there may be ‘millions getting away with it’, but how does that mean that I alone am identified as having a ‘hit list’ and why, just because others are ‘at it’, should those bankers and MP’s who are corrupt, selfish and/or irresponsible not be identified as such?