Quote Originally Posted by the_idiotb_stardson View Post
where is the harmful line John? who decides?

Would you say Bhakdi is harmful? If so why?

Please think it though where this is heading.
OK, 30 seconds of Googling got me 3 articles fact checking that guys claims:
https://www.presseportal.de/pm/133833/4555917
https://www.swr3.de/aktuell/multimed...orona-100.html
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/medien/c...book-1.4873470


I'm not going to waste too much of my time going into detail.

I'll answer more generally about what the harm is.

I have very close friends who work front line as doctors with coronavirus patients in intensive care. Who have to tell loved ones their relatives aren't going to survive.

I've got a friend who has been in intensive care on a ventilator and had a stroke despite being in his 40s.

This virus is very real and very serious and very contagious.

These are all facts.

Doctor friends tell me they now have patients who argue with them about their own treatment, 'big pharma', are sceptical of the drugs they are being prescribed because of things they read online. They're having to waste and dedicate time to fighting the wilful spread of misinformation by people not equipped to give it the critical approach is demands and think they know better than experienced doctors. The harm of people resisting things like vaccinations is very harmful.

Lock down works, that's a fact. To what extent we need to continue is up for reasonable debate. But pushing people saying its no good, or the virus isn't serious is objectively wrong, and widespread misinformation can influence public opinion and lead to outcomes that result in many deaths.