Var

[Yeats 62]

The Rangers are furious with var today after the denial of a stonewaller yesterday.Yes a penalty should have been awarded to them but as they were offside in the build up it would have been rescinded anyway.Their manager is a big advocate of var{Ha Ha you don't say}but they are demanding the audio so they can hear all the phuck up's going on in the var room.

The penny has hopefully dropped for Clement now that when you play Celtic its a level playing field compared to the bias in his favour when the diddy teams are involved.

Deluded!!!

Is this going to be another new implementation with VAR? It's bad enough the VAR operators and the refs being disected by each other and the media, but............ are they now going to have to let certain teams hear what was said between officials? That will open another huge can of worms. Why not just link a live feed to the dugouts of the old firm? (saves any bather later)

[GUNBOAT]

Deluded!!!

Is this going to be another new implementation with VAR? It's bad enough the VAR operators and the refs being disected by each other and the media, but............ are they now going to have to let certain teams hear what was said between officials? That will open another huge can of worms. Why not just link a live feed to the dugouts of the old firm? (saves any bather later)

The Rangers have released another War and Peace statement and remain perplexed and concerned regarding Willie Collum not awarding a var penalty to them yesterday regardless of the FACT that The Rangers were clearly offside in the build up.They are also not happy that no one from the SFA have been prepared to meet them on a Hogmany Sunday or on New Years day or the holiday Tuesday the 2nd of January.

The SFA will not deal with them until the FIRST working day of next week which is Wednesday the 3rd.The unwritten rule of Scottish football is if The Rangers say jump the authorities answer how high and will we raise a trouser leg too?.

[Stoke_Arab]

"We are not the People" 🥳

[GUNBOAT]

The ex player pundit on SKY's ref watch say's he thinks Collum was right not to award a var pen to The Rangers,Dermot the ref thinks it was a penalty however cannot understand the fuss as offside happened first so everything after is immaterial.

[Stoke_Arab]

The ex player pundit on SKY's ref watch say's he thinks Collum was right not to award a var pen to The Rangers,Dermot the ref thinks it was a penalty however cannot understand the fuss as offside happened first so everything after is immaterial.

Correct. But what the Sevconians are hoping to prove is that there was a Catholic Papal Conspiracy to deny a penalty even if it was offside first.

F**k them. Their sense of entitlement is off the page. They think they run the game up here, tbf at times it looks like they do.

It's a trap for the SPFL because if they provide the audio regardless of what it says, Sevco have won by forcing their hand. If they refuse to provide the audio Sevco will say it's a CPC cover up.

They're vile people running a vile horrible club.

[GUNBOAT]

Correct. But what the Sevconians are hoping to prove is that there was a Catholic Papal Conspiracy to deny a penalty even if it was offside first.

F**k them. Their sense of entitlement is off the page. They think they run the game up here, tbf at times it looks like they do.

It's a trap for the SPFL because if they provide the audio regardless of what it says, Sevco have won by forcing their hand. If they refuse to provide the audio Sevco will say it's a CPC cover up.

They're vile people running a vile horrible club.

100% spot on Stokie Boy,another reason for them to keep this going is to force even more var decisions in their favour for the rest of the season which is a cast iron certainty.

[weegiearab]

It is clearly a f#ck up by those on VAR. If it was offside, then why was a goal kick awarded? Either way, I couldn't give a sh!te. Sevco has experienced the VAR standard that every other club gets week in and week out. VAR helps get more decisions right than wrong...but it just highlights poor refereeing when they make a mistake. VAR just adds another poor ref to the mix. They have benefited from the poor refs and VAR...when you consider the Goldson handballs last season.

[JamesMcClean]

It is clearly a f#ck up by those on VAR. If it was offside, then why was a goal kick awarded? Either way, I couldn't give a sh!te. Sevco has experienced the VAR standard that every other club gets week in and week out. VAR helps get more decisions right than wrong...but it just highlights poor refereeing when they make a mistake. VAR just adds another poor ref to the mix. They have benefited from the poor refs and VAR...when you consider the Goldson handballs last season.

For once it wasn’t a phuck up by VAR. As it was offside initially there literally was nothing to see here as everything, including the handball, was moot thereafter and unrequiring of any VAR review. The Rangers are really not getting this………………

[GUNBOAT]

For once it wasn’t a phuck up by VAR. As it was offside initially there literally was nothing to see here as everything, including the handball, was moot thereafter and unrequiring of any VAR review. The Rangers are really not getting this………………

I think The Rangers mindset is anytime a ball played by them hits an opponents hand in his penalty box its a penalty.It matters not a jot to them that they were offside they still want the satisfaction of seeing the referee's arm with a straight hand pointing to the spot.

[Stoke_Arab]

I was isolating with Covid so decided to watch the match. The Sevco VAR thing looks a bit of a smokescreen to prevent their fans talking about how completely inferior they still are to their bigot brothers. That Dessers wanted 5 touches when through one on one v Hart 🙈