The Home Secretary is apparently facing possible legal action for neglecting asylum seekers! You may not be a fan of Suella Braverman but this is just crazy; they came here of their own accord, there should be no ‘expectations’, especially when there are British citizens in dire straits who will possibly be colder and hungrier than the aforementioned asylum seekers.
If you recruited from overseas you would know that brexit has overhauled the immigration system. It’s radically different.
You can still recruit to doctors, nurses, academics etc. but you can no longer fill a low skilled role with a migrant.
That’s the points based system people wanted isn’t it?
You are right Matt! All for much needed doctors, engineers etc but no for illegals who should be sent to Rwanda for processing. Many businesses especially hospitality are on their knees as no cleaners etc. Surely these illegals should be tagged and set to work where Labour is needed before they have their first hot meal. Not many in this country have a free lunch and many are desperate now!
Sunak the t wat needs to get a grip with controlling billions being wasted before another tax grab. Times will be difficult Sunak says - not for his tax avoiding mrs though!!
I haven't a clue what people want to be honest. If I had to guess, most voted to be poorer, in exchange for fewer immigrants. But what we've done is made it harder for immigrants to come here who were contributing and easier to come here for non-contributing immigrants. And here we are economically worse off and posters on this thread complaining about immigration.
Yeah doctors, academics would be great (I'm still not so sure it's that easy for them to be recruited btw) but the real effect on our economy is the low paid roles. We need truck drivers, fruit pickers, hospitality staff etc. so European immigration was very important to our economy pre-2016.
Because of shortfalls in this area, businesses now need to pay more for staff and supply costs - which drives up inflation. Inflation is high, so BoE has increased interest rates. That's why I found it financially baffling why anyone voted leave.
Of course, we would have had economic issues anyway with global issues outside of our control such as the war and Covid, but Brexit has just compounded it. We will have a far worse recession than most of the rest of the developed world in my opinion - and it will be self-inflicted.
Last edited by WBA123; 04-11-2022 at 09:04 AM.
Britain has recklessly handled immigration for a very long time. We had a workforce shortage and lazily brought in millions of low skilled migrants, with completely differing values and languages and chucked them, in there droves into low income towns and just thought everything would be fine for the original incumbents of that town. The original British contingent in that area then went from having a community of knowing everyone around them to having a street full of limited English speaking folks, with their own community and with values completely different to ours (for example burka wearers).
We then ask those folk if they want a change to a more responsible system and they get ostracised and ridiculed by the folk who haven't had their communities altered in this way. It beggars belief that these folk can't think beyond their own circumstances and think about the reality! That's the reality of immigration and Brexit.
We need a change in the way our economy works, from constantly flooding it with people to keep the costs down and become more self sufficient. Many countries have a tactical, responsible immigration system and the fruit still gets picked.
Let’s bow down to the anti Brexit supporters and take lessons from the mighty EU where inflation is currently 10.7%. They know best.
Interesting point of view, apart from the demographics don’t really back up your perspective. Generally, areas with more immigration were more likely to vote remain, such as London where I live - or most large cities in the UK.
The areas who largely voted leave were the opposite, areas which hadn’t been ‘flooded by foreigners in their droves’. The North East, Wales and Cornwall for example.
So although your point may apply in some limited situations, on the whole it’s not typical of why people voted the way they did. Do you think immigrants are risking life and limb to flood north wales or similar areas where these is no work? Yet these areas voted to leave overwhelmingly, probably because they voted very naively and bought into every con from the Leave campaign going.
At the end of the day, if you voted to Leave it really wasn’t a very intelligent way to vote, as has been proved since 2016. And if you’re now whinging about immigration, then it especially hasn’t been worth it.
You can look at the data in anyway you like and make a different argument but there weren't many areas in England that voted remain. London was an outlier, one of the only outliers for England and there could be a number of reasons for that, such as age demographics. I can't comment for Scotland, Wales or Ireland but given migration has been less an issue in those countries, it's no surprise they saw no benefit in leaving.
For England there was a significant link between deprivation and voting leave. The Black Country for example, overwhelmingly voted leave. This, despite higher levels of migrants settling in the Black Country than most areas (who you would think would prefer to remain although who knows...)
I do think if you voted Brexit, you wouldn't/shouldn't have expected any realistic change for a long time. It's hardly got off the ground in reality. I don't see how you can evaluate if it's worked or not...it hasn't even been 3 years since we left and 2 of those have been during a pandemic FFS. Talk about it in 15 years and you'll get a proper view about what it is and how it's impacted the UK.
Last edited by baggiematt; 05-11-2022 at 06:29 AM.