Ok, I will answer your question:
He obviously did improve them, and I don't think we would have won so many games nor scored so many goals. However, I do think that Langstaff would have scored a lot of goals because he is a natural. I think IB may have got us to 2nd, but not with such a big gap over 3rd.
Now how about you answer my question;
Was the squad that LW had better than IB or NA had?
The thing with football management is that the players are either good enough or not. The whole stats thing about management is Horlicks.. there are some on here that say that Pep is cack, yet his win rate is up there with the best in the world.
At the end of the day managers are as good as the players that play for them…. Cotterill would have been **** if not for Hughes, Kasper etc