+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3111213
Results 121 to 126 of 126

Thread: Norwich City Post Match Thoughts

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    27,049
    Quote Originally Posted by HensonsPRman View Post
    Timbertop I think TS has gone beyond his sell by date, but your comments above are wrong. He has put in £2.9m in the last 10 years plus there is an additional shareholder loan of £0.9m, so total funding of £3.8m Its all in the accounts see the link https://twitter.com/christoph_21/sta...O4lQ8z13w&s=19
    Does that include the sponsorship money from his other businesses HPRM?

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,345
    Quote Originally Posted by CAMiller View Post
    Does that include the sponsorship money from his other businesses HPRM?
    CAM wouldn't they spend that money anyway as part of their marketing spend? Are there tax reasons why sponsoring in such a way benefits those companies? Not deflecting away from the fact you are correct it is a valid way that TS has input more money, just wondering what the full picture is

  3. #123
    Quote Originally Posted by Derbymiller View Post
    CAM wouldn't they spend that money anyway as part of their marketing spend? Are there tax reasons why sponsoring in such a way benefits those companies? Not deflecting away from the fact you are correct it is a valid way that TS has input more money, just wondering what the full picture is
    Yes, generally speaking sports sponsorship is tax deductible for the donating company

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Posts
    1,265
    Quote Originally Posted by CAMiller View Post
    Does that include the sponsorship money from his other businesses HPRM?
    Cam that does not include the sponsorship money, from his company, which is tax deductible. In most years this has been a figure that equates to the rent the club is charged by RU estates for the club using the stadium, roughly £1m per annum but in some years it has been more than that.

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    27,049
    Quote Originally Posted by Derbymiller View Post
    CAM wouldn't they spend that money anyway as part of their marketing spend? Are there tax reasons why sponsoring in such a way benefits those companies? Not deflecting away from the fact you are correct it is a valid way that TS has input more money, just wondering what the full picture is
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    Yes, generally speaking sports sponsorship is tax deductible for the donating company
    Quote Originally Posted by HensonsPRman View Post
    Cam that does not include the sponsorship money, from his company, which is tax deductible. In most years this has been a figure that equates to the rent the club is charged by RU estates for the club using the stadium, roughly £1m per annum but in some years it has been more than that.
    Thanks. Just because it's tax deductible it doesn't mean it's free, it just means that it's income he doesn't pay tax on so on giving 1m means he really gives 600k out of his own pocket and 400k out of the tax mans pocket (if his tax band is 40%). I also don't disagree that AES will spend marketing money anyway but they don't strike me as a company would be spending the likes of what they are 'giving' to RUFC.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    814
    Quote Originally Posted by CAMiller View Post
    Timbertop clearly thinks that money TS has made through his other businesses isn't his 'personal money' but must belong to someone else.
    Ah yes. There's plenty of those round here.

Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3111213

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •