+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Rumours presented as fact

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,632
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    I think you’re talking about two different things there. The first highlighted paragraph is people more than likely pretending to be in the know and making stuff up, not good. In terms of bust ups I do find it a bit curious that McGoldrick was initially out with a dead leg but hasn’t been seen now for 3 or 4 weeks, and with a lack of any other info people will look for other explanations especially when results are poor.

    The second is fans generally giving their honest if premature opinions on a new player. That seems reasonable to me, and something I’ve done myself, albeit with the caveat that he might well come good. Fingers crossed that’s what he’s doing.

    The recovery time for a dead leg depends on the severity of the injury. For a Grade 1, you should be able to return to play in 2-3 weeks. For a Grade 2, the recovery time is 4-6 weeks. The longer duration is due to the increased damage to the muscles

    Here you go. Hope that clears it up.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    10,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Notts78 View Post
    The recovery time for a dead leg depends on the severity of the injury. For a Grade 1, you should be able to return to play in 2-3 weeks. For a Grade 2, the recovery time is 4-6 weeks. The longer duration is due to the increased damage to the muscles

    Here you go. Hope that clears it up.
    We dont need him now, as we have a more mobile player in Jatta...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,186
    Quote Originally Posted by Notts78 View Post
    The recovery time for a dead leg depends on the severity of the injury. For a Grade 1, you should be able to return to play in 2-3 weeks. For a Grade 2, the recovery time is 4-6 weeks. The longer duration is due to the increased damage to the muscles

    Here you go. Hope that clears it up.
    Maynard didn’t say that in the interview after the game he did it though. Very much intimated he’d be back the next game. Maybe a bit of inexperience when it comes to answering questions like that.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,927
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    Maynard didn’t say that in the interview after the game he did it though. Very much intimated he’d be back the next game. Maybe a bit of inexperience when it comes to answering questions like that.
    SM cleared it up in his pre Bradford interview. They also showed the challenge that did it and it’s horrible.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    6,240
    If posters are going to start giving reasonable explanations for supposed unrest in the camp it's not going to be worthwhile inventing rumours, is it?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    797
    Jatta keeping McGoldrick out of the starting 11 for a while might be good for them both. Our subs under SM haven't always been in a position to change the game - you have to think Didzy would be quite the impact sub.

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by LaxtonLad View Post
    If posters are going to start giving reasonable explanations for supposed unrest in the camp it's not going to be worthwhile inventing rumours, is it?
    Surely such comments of this nature are worthy of a short swift ban !! Please stop talking such sence !!!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •