+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Cedwyn Scott

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    789

    Cedwyn Scott

    Whilst I appreciate that he's been out for most of the season I'm a little surprised that he's not already been offered a contract extension given that he's unlikely to prove much either way in what's left of the season.
    As for Bajrami, I expect him to leave with us never really sure if he could contribute much to us.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Observerpie View Post
    Whilst I appreciate that he's been out for most of the season I'm a little surprised that he's not already been offered a contract extension given that he's unlikely to prove much either way in what's left of the season.
    As for Bajrami, I expect him to leave with us never really sure if he could contribute much to us.
    Cedwyn Scott is a really under-appreciated asset in my opinion. Yes he's had an injury, but he's definitely worth keeping.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    10,321
    Quote Originally Posted by jackal2 View Post
    Cedwyn Scott is a really under-appreciated asset in my opinion. Yes he's had an injury, but he's definitely worth keeping.
    Spot on.. His goals per game ratio are has good as Macca.. But this fool of a manager will probably play him at wing back...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,691
    Quote Originally Posted by jackal2 View Post
    Cedwyn Scott is a really under-appreciated asset in my opinion. Yes he's had an injury, but he's definitely worth keeping.
    Absolutely, would be perfect to play the Langstaff role next season. Not a chance that Macca is staying so need to find a replacement, why not from within.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    3,574
    Might sound a bit harsh but considering the disasters with signing Morias etc I would be happier if he proved his fitness first before offering him a contract extension.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    10,321
    Quote Originally Posted by OP67 View Post
    Absolutely, would be perfect to play the Langstaff role next season. Not a chance that Macca is staying so need to find a replacement, why not from within.
    Gateshead fans said Scott was the better of the 2...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,509
    I'd like to see him get a new contract, even if he goes out on loan next season for fitness. Deserves his chance after being forced to play on for a few minutes with a serious injury after Williams had put all his subs on.
    I don't think we can justify giving Baj a contract as he was in the Ed Francis, Frank Vincent camp of not quite good enough to hold a place down.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,158
    He will have now and pre season to prove his fitness and can get back the same player, what is on his side is he is a young guy 24-25.

    As harsh as it sounds if we offered him a deal and he broke down again we'd be in the same boat.

    Bajami is the same he is still fairly young and can play a few positions so is a useful squad player.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by legs77 View Post
    He will have now and pre season to prove his fitness and can get back the same player, what is on his side is he is a young guy 24-25.

    As harsh as it sounds if we offered him a deal and he broke down again we'd be in the same boat.

    Bajami is the same he is still fairly young and can play a few positions so is a useful squad player.
    I hope that both of them are given the chance to impress. I agree that Scott is a very good player with the ability to make a regular spot in the starting 11. Baj is versatile and committed and can do a job at DM and CB. Unless we make multiple signings in those positions he is worth keeping. Both subject to fitness of course.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •