The penny must of dropped with Coyle after Saturday that both Lowe and feeney are not good enough and must be the first names scrubbed from the team sheet on Tuesday
sadly with Lowe as captain it's almost as if Coyle feels he has to play him.
Printable View
The penny must of dropped with Coyle after Saturday that both Lowe and feeney are not good enough and must be the first names scrubbed from the team sheet on Tuesday
sadly with Lowe as captain it's almost as if Coyle feels he has to play him.
As Byrne doesn't seem to have made it, we really should be looking for another central midfielder in January - unless Mulgrew is pushed forward.Quote:
Originally Posted by robinrover
Mulgrew needs to be pushed forward
comfortable on the ball and a much needed leader in the middle of the park
I am more perplexed by wes brown
is he not fit?is he not good enough?
We have been playing 2 midfielders at the back while he has been playing for our reserves.
This is one of the many reasons I hold concerns over the current set up and personnel. We all seem to be viewing OC's deliberations with some consternation. This although in character he's very 'enthusiastic' ala SK !
I am actually on the match tonite, so given my fears (in my predicted outcome), can't say I'm buzzing with optimism.
I am just hoping we get the same fortune afforded us as that against Hudds.
As I have said before though, just 'hoping to fortune' may not keep us safe.
I will try my best to be not as scathing with my views, if the guys put a full shift in and they do not shy away and commit to any opportunity that presents itself.
Well, I've just looked at the line-up, and you have to say, no-one could accuse Coyle of being defensively-minded!
Emnes is in, as well as Gallagher and Graham. It doesn't look exactly balanced, but you'd think we should be able to score. I suppose hitting long passes towards THREE forward-players must increase your chances.
I wonder how we'll line up. Surely not 4-3-3!
Perhaps I'll change my prediction to 4-4.