We're linked with him again. He's better than what we've got I reckon, though he's a sick note.
I'd rather see Mitrovic get a fair run in the team before we bring anyone else in. Unless it's Benzema or Higuain.
Printable View
We're linked with him again. He's better than what we've got I reckon, though he's a sick note.
I'd rather see Mitrovic get a fair run in the team before we bring anyone else in. Unless it's Benzema or Higuain.
We need 3 players who can push for a starting spot straight away: striker, No 10 and a LB. (Actually 4, ideally - GK too).
We should sell Gayle while we´re at it.
I'd want him to prove his fitness first.
He's been at Liverpool for 3 seasons (this is his 3rd) and he's played only 12 games due to injury. Made his return again this season in League cup on 19th Sept and hasn't played since.
We can't afford to have that level of injured player this season.
I'd of had him before he went to Liverpool and should he go on loan and show he can play i'd be happy to put a bid in for him in summer, assuming we need a striker (if we don't get a permanent one in Jan) but for the 2nd part of the season. No from me.
Pointless
Exactly and while were at it,fatcnut will not buy Benzema or Higuain and why would they come?Quote:
Originally Posted by toonviking
i think the Benzema and Higuain comment was tongue in cheek to be fair..
but Danny Ings?
no thank you!
Oh! I thought it was due to the excitement of said takeover/buyout...:DQuote:
Originally Posted by waalsendmick
The point was that Ings is not a striker that will guarantee us goals. Like Benzema or Higuain would.Quote:
Originally Posted by ashingtoon62
Oakie doakie,just thought you had been caught up in the furore?Quote:
Originally Posted by HughieG
Bet you have,why pull them two names oot? :D