This news will debunk a few myths on here...
https://www.burnleyexpress.net/sport...ague-1-8967703
Printable View
This news will debunk a few myths on here...
https://www.burnleyexpress.net/sport...ague-1-8967703
I don`t know who wrote that article but I bet they are good fun on a night out.
He would calculate the amount of alcohol you consume CiB by the square root of the amount of money in your wallet and tell you exactly how long you have left until you are shellacked! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ClaretinBudapest
A bit of a daft way to reach that conclusion?
Surely it is the way that the team is set up that has more impact on attacking play than substitutes used?
And we certainly use a very rigid "framework" which is designed to make it difficult to breach our defence?
Having said that, there were real signs that our attack was getting more potent when Iceman, Cork, Defour, Brady, Henrick were all doing the business a few weeks ago.
But to say that Burnley are more attack minded than City, Spurs, Liverpool, because of our substitutions, is just plain bonkers.
Oh! Ye of little faith! :?
I'm not being critical about our team BT - I'm very happy.
But we have scored 19 goals in 23 games.
City have scored 67 in 23 games.
How can we be more attack minded than them?
Read the fcuking article!
It's about intent to change the game via substitutions! :(
I have read it BT.
The headline claims, "Stats show that Clarets boss Sean Dyche is the most attacking manager in the Premier League"
And the thread title makes this claim as well.
When you read the article, the claim is based solely on his substitutions.
The more relevant "stats show" is that we have scored 19 goals in 23 games.
I will not be going down the pub tonight spouting that "Sean Dyche is the most attacking manager in the Premier League"
I like an argument, but I like to show a BIT of reality as well!
Reading only the headlines gets you into bother. Just ask sinkov! :p
Writing them can be even worse bother!Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier