Nicky Hunt.

Yes or no? He'll have the experience but does he have the legs? Doesn't he also have a disciplinary record? What would be the average age of the team/squad be with his signing?
At the alexst moment you're either recently from the academy or you're well in to your thirties
Comments?

I'd give him a one year deal. Better to have a specialist FB, but one year only as his legs will certainly not last beyond that.

In the local news today. Still in DA's plans it would seem, as he was due to speak to the Chairman concerning this (Radio Stoke).

Surely Andy Scoffin announced him as "our new signing, number 29" on the subs bench on Saturday? I assumed he'd signed that morning but can't find any more on this on OS?

He has now - 1 year deal, which seems about right.

Me too - either Scoff let the cat out of the bag early on Saturday, or it was agreed but not signed and OS waited till that was done. He wore his squad number to sit on the bench.

I was very impressed when he came on for George Ray. Took a while for the team to settle to the change, but Hunt did what he had to do with aplomb.

I thought he was steady and gave a good account of himself.
Might be controversial but one thing I think it proved is that Ng is not ready yet at CH

Can't agree about Perry - thought he was fine. Hunt was very useful with the ball but his total lack of pace was evident a couple of times.