Originally Posted by
TheBigSausage
So in theory .. Since Benitez and Ashley can't see eye to eye ..Would it have been better "for the team" ,for Ashley to have sacked Benitez and employed someone he would have given money to?
The rumours are that Benitez gets money "if" he signs a new contract .. If not .. No money . So a new manager = money for transfers.
The glaring mistake in this strategy for Ashley is that he owns the team , and if we go down , more money to spend .
But 70m parachute payments , lascelles , Shelvey, Ritchie , Dubravka.. Etc out the door .. Will he actually lose that much ?
Be cheaper to sack Benitez .. 5 months contract to pay up, and Pardeux installed .