He wants ANOTHER keeper.
I cannot for the life of me understand why we need another keeper,when we have signed 2 decent ones.
Printable View
He wants ANOTHER keeper.
I cannot for the life of me understand why we need another keeper,when we have signed 2 decent ones.
Signing his best mates son at that. TM wants to be careful.. he's in danger of ruining all the good stuff at the start of this season.Quote:
Originally Posted by robinrover
I didn't know that saxo.
It's a pointless signing really and would result in 1 of the 3 keepers doing absolutely nothing but play in the under 23's.
We have a good up and coming keeper in eastham,who will suffer as a consequence of this.
if Kaminski got injured, who actually could step into the first team, say tomorrow? Fisher would be disasterous. As would Estham, who is merley a kid. Abd the greek lad is only 20. None of those are close to the first team. One is now being allowed to go on loan. We desperately need a number 2. This was a no brainer.
Estham will play for the Under 20's.
The young 20 year old Greek lad plays for the Under 23's.
The new keeper is the first team number 2. Who replaces Luetwiller.
Kaminski plays number one.
All we have done is sign a better keeper than Fisher who showed he wasn't good enough, so we let him go out on loan. He isn't around the Under 23's. We have found a better younger keeper. And replaced Luetwiller. Which we needed to.
We are in excatly the same position as where keeper number wise as last season. We just have a better number one. A better Under 23 (far better!) and a much better number 2 for the first team.
And a far far better number in one in Kaminski.
I personally feel it's a waste of money when we dont have an abundance lying around.
Eastham and Hilton are the under 23 keepers.
Why bring in a lad who is already playing senior football(I know it's in Bulgaria)to play in our youth set up?
No sign of pears joining at all today.. Greek lad our number 2..
Ignore! ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Saxo1man41