Originally Posted by
Psaw
No no no no. If we take a moral stance then improvement is not possible. Reproducing faulty genes propogates and reproduces faulty genes. So the smaller, not the bigger claw predominates.
And in current thinking, like socialist thinking, the smaller claw must be protected, even in religious thinking. So an intelligent civilisation must not tolerate smaller claws, it must make sure smaller claws are obliterated. Small claws equal no further reproduction.
The moral stance is therefore to weed out small claws.
And take nescessary action. That is the case isnt it.?
If you look at the evolution of man, the point is proven, over and over again. We used to be small brained apes, now we are big brained apes. Where does morality fit into that? Before we were apes, we were small rodents etc. Why would we want to remain small brained apes or rodents?
The only way to go big is to choose big.
As you say above, acknowledge evolution. I see you as a small claw, therfore you must not be allowed to reproduce, i want your knackers nailed to my front door.