Is there no end to these c*nts whining?
Rangers give SFA warning after 'corrupt' remark fine - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/a...s/cn0qev4ezqqo
Printable View
Is there no end to these c*nts whining?
Rangers give SFA warning after 'corrupt' remark fine - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/a...s/cn0qev4ezqqo
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp86x6l1npjo
The perpetrator was recognised by his distinctive white teeth 😆
you really couldnt make it up.............
it sounds like they haveQuote:
Originally Posted by geofoxposse
SFA response
Friday 20 June 2025
We note Rangers? response to the determination of a recent independent Judicial Panel Tribunal. In the interests of accuracy, we wish to address some of the misleading comments contained therein:
The sanction imposed by an independent panel was entirely in keeping with the application of the rules. The most recent and relevant example of a similar breach, the sanction imposed on Richard Foster of Motherwell FC for comments of a similar nature in the media, attests to that.
Furthermore, to address the comments regarding ?rationale behind differing outcomes?, we wish to point to the fact that investigations were undertaken in previous cases outlined and that the Compliance Officers of the time saw fit to issue a censure by way of warning letter for potential breaches deemed insufficiently serious to be progressed to a Notice of Complaint.
This system of proportionality has been adopted since the inception of the Judicial Panel Protocol in 2011. Indeed, such discretion was exercised last season when the Compliance Officer wrote to the club to warn of the future conduct of players following matters involving Vaclav Cerny, Dujon Sterling and Mohamed Diomande.
We also note that Rangers intend to contact the association to seek clarity on the Judicial Panel Protocol and its application. The club is, in fact, already represented on the JPP Working Group.
We have requested written reasons from the panel chair involved in the tribunal and in the interests of transparency will publish in due course.
JPP Rule 38 was introduced in response to the referee strike of 2010, when match officials campaigned for greater protection after enduring sustained personal criticism from clubs and fans. Ahead of a new season, we remind clubs of their responsibilities in this regard.
He said something in the heat of the moment...that happens with in house commentators. When it was pointed out that he shouldn't say what he said, he didn't back down...he doubled down...that is where the problem lies! The SFA are 100% correct to do this!
Yeah he could have said he was being a bit silly when challenged by the other commentator