Printable View
Yes I do, as stated in the above post. I don't know how these figures are calculated, but if it is purely people who were offered a jag and have been given it, do you actually believe the figure is 100% in any age cohort?Quote:
Originally Posted by AraBrian
To be fair I found 100% hard to believe myself but until now had not heard from anyone else who knew anyone in that age group who had not received it and to be honest thought it was a very stupid lie if it was not true if they were trying to mess with the figures to look better thought they would put 98% or 99% so if anyone like you knew of people in that age group who had refused it or not received it for any reason would still believe their figures.You have now proved that their figures are not correct and if that age group is not correct then are any of the age groups can we trust any of the figures they are giving out?Only thing I thought might make 100% right was if was only people who could receive jab but you know of people refusing it so figures are just not true.Quote:
Originally Posted by jjaflup22
I think the % figures that are given out are % of people who have been offered the jab, not whether they have taken it or not
Is that the 2 sisters plant again?Quote:
Originally Posted by tHeArAb
It does though highlight why i think all those in public facing and high density workplaces should be vaccinated as the next priority. The possible transmission field for this kind of outbreak is quite worrying for me!
What have the NHS to gain from using an offered figure? With the numbers involved, 2m have had their first jabs, so surely the offered figure with the size of age groups as they are now, there must be another 250-500k offer letters out there?Quote:
Originally Posted by BackRowArab
Nic for a while repeatedly mentioned the figures were based on doses administered and not offers. This was at a time where Boris et al, were saying Offered quite a lot in creating headline figures, something i have to say they are about to pay for if my suspicions are to be proved right.
That would make sense but does not really tell us anything 10,20,30 or 40% in each group could be refusing it we really don't know how many have had it just how many have been offered it.Quote:
Originally Posted by BackRowArab
Right, well that makes more sense. However it's rather a pointless exercise then as they could have offered 5 million and only 200 might have taken it!Quote:
Originally Posted by BackRowArab
HAHAHA just said the same XDQuote:
Originally Posted by jjaflup22
🤣Quote:
Originally Posted by AraBrian
I really dont believe the theory that the daily figures are those OFFERED vaccinations, and if you look at the numbers vaccinated so far, then add in estimated totals for each age group down to 60-64 to assume they have all been offered an appointment, then that figure is 2,112,926, against Tuesdays total of 1,981,818 vaccinated. If everyone in all the Cohorts and age groups down to 55-59 have been offered, that figure then becomes 2,338,813.
I do have questions about some of the reporting, but i do believe what is reported about daily vaccines is what is getting into peoples arms.