Ex-Dons

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redscot

And yet he would still have been a better choice than Clangers.

---

No he wouldn’t.
Langfield was average & cost us a good few times but he was better than Rogers.
He’s Killie’s no2 keeper for a reason.
Championship is his level IMO.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedStarTorphins

Danny Rogers letting one in from 35 yards that I’d have saved.
Showing exactly why he was never good enough for Aberdeen.

---

Are you basing that on the fact he let one in from that distance ? David seaman let two in from a greater distance he was still a good keeper.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedStarTorphins

Danny Rogers letting one in from 35 yards that I’d have saved.
Showing exactly why he was never good enough for Aberdeen.

---

I’ve been away all week, so I’ve not seen it. Was it better or worse than when Clangers got ‘megged from outside the box at Parkhead?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mason89

I’ve been away all week, so I’ve not seen it. Was it better or worse than when Clangers got ‘megged from outside the box at Parkhead?

---

Awwww have I upset the Danny Rogers Fanboys No1 cheerleader XD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basingstokered

Are you basing that on the fact he let one in from that distance ? David seaman let two in from a greater distance he was still a good keeper.

---

No.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedStarTorphins

No.

---

Could you let us know what else your basing it on then.

Your probably the type to think anyone that comes through our youth ranks are rotten after they have 1 game whilst signings should be given time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedStarTorphins

No he wouldn’t.
Langfield was average & cost us a good few times but he was better than Rogers.
He’s Killie’s no2 keeper for a reason.
Championship is his level IMO.

---

Correct

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basingstokered

Could you let us know what else your basing it on then.

Your probably the type to think anyone that comes through our youth ranks are rotten after they have 1 game whilst signings should be given time.

---

Nope.
Wrong again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Basingstokered

Could you let us know what else your basing it on then.

Your probably the type to think anyone that comes through our youth ranks are rotten after they have 1 game whilst signings should be given time.

---

And if we’re playing a talking sh1te making stupid assumptions game (you’re good at it to be fair) you’re probably the type that castigates the club for letting go the likes of Rogers, Shaughnessy, Shankland & Smith, when barely anyone complained at the time.
I don’t care if you are or aren’t like that.
I’m just making a random assumption based on the square root of f**k all.
Like you did

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedStarTorphins

And if we’re playing a talking sh1te making stupid assumptions game (you’re good at it to be fair) you’re probably the type that castigates the club for letting go the likes of Rogers, Shaughnessy, Shankland & Smith, when barely anyone complained at the time.
I don’t care if you are or aren’t like that.
I’m just making a random assumption based on the square root of f**k all.
Like you did

---

Your right I am but at least I can admit it.