fine isnt a deterrent but it is legally questionable anyway to have a rule that states you cant take governing body to court. Thats why it was so low. The details will be re written to explain the process going forward apparently
Printable View
fine isnt a deterrent but it is legally questionable anyway to have a rule that states you cant take governing body to court. Thats why it was so low. The details will be re written to explain the process going forward apparently
Don’t forget though that Hearts and Thistle have the arbitration legal bill to come for the pair of them. OYF!
Hopeful that is the end of it and we can get back to the futba
***** seek oh it all and time to put it behind us.
Hertz/Thistle should release a statement accepting it and get on with their team activities.
Shambolic amateurism by several parties with Hearts self interest & dam all others attitude the worst.
SFA/SPFL and all clubs should ensure there is now a legally binding agreement considering this and other eventualities.
Time for futba
Wtf has that got to with anything 🚀🚀🚀Quote:
Originally Posted by FTFun
Quality banter as always from you...no wonder nobody likes you😄😄😄Quote:
Originally Posted by Arabdownsouth
Stop talking to yourselfQuote:
Originally Posted by petermackie
Oh the ****ing irony!!!!
https://www.heartsfc.co.uk/news/arti...-3-4-5-6-7-8-9
"Suffice to say that at a time when every football club in the land is managing its costs as tightly as possible, we have incurred significant “unnecessary” costs.
We have done nothing wrong and yet, once again, we are being disproportionately disadvantaged by a decision which has been described as “the fairest”. "
They are a championship club now. Why do they think they should get special dispensation to train before all the other clubs are allowed to? Are they seeking a competitive advantage over all the other lower league clubs?Quote:
Originally Posted by tHeArAb
Sounding more and more like Sevco with every statement.
Awww diddumsQuote:
Originally Posted by tHeArAb