Ah yes, he's gone.
Interesting.....
Printable View
Ah yes, he's gone.
Interesting.....
This is a worse shîteshow than Goodwin’s December/January freefall.
Much funnier, of course.
Civil war within The Party incoming.
Time to invest in ferret-breeding farms and sacking manufacturers, if you’re that way inclined.
Actually, I’m not a great fan of popcorn.
Mind you, there are only a couple of months to wait until Goodwin becomes available for the gig.
That pair must have lived and breathed pro-Scottish anti-English tripe 24/7 - a true folie a deux arrangement, I think. Implosion was inevitable, as they were entirely obsessed. Forbes seems much more reasonable and balanced, aside from her early naive statements. A lot of disharmony in that Party is now well and truly manifesting itself and the dissenters were clearly all stifled by the lunatic Sturgeon.
The chief executive being married to the leader was weird and wouldn't happen in any other party. Even if it is a fake marriage.
It’s also tremendously entertaining seeing the leadership candidates ripping into each other and acknowledging the multiple failings of their own Party over the last couple of decades. Mind you, they have a lot of material to choose from as the SNP has been a complete and utter disaster with everything they’ve touched including education, ferries, health, the Edinburgh trams project, the economy etc, etc, and much too focused on the central belt. What a truly disgraceful Party.
For the sake of accuracy, the re-introduction of trams in Edinburgh was a decision taken by Edinburgh City Council, and was supported by Holyrood’s pre-2011 non-nationalist majority in Parliament, with Salmond’s lot against it.
Having used it a few times in Edinburgh, it is an impressive service like, and I hope the Newhaven extension, currently under test, is a success.
On the other scandals you list, I concur with your dissatisfaction.
What you both have done differently with the ferries? Put everyone out a job or place your trust in the spiv because that was the only options. Every party wanted the second option & every party would’ve faced the same problem