It's not just the BBC though, anyone who has no interest in watching ITV still has to pay for it.
Printable View
It's well known that all true socialists should be relatively poor themselves and give away a significant amount of what they do have in order to achieve some kind of balance in society. Otherwise, it's sheer hypocrisy. Champagne socialists ... don't you just love em?
Wot like the Lineker garbage. Hes shelling out now because his reputation depends on it. Like all socialists he expects someone else to do something.
This morning i watched four people talking garbage while a geezer was frying something in a pan on the BBC. This was the worst tv i have ever seen. Cheap and nasty, it just fills time. If it was the Soviet Union, it would be watching a combine harvester tilling crops from 9 am till 6 pm when we get the news.
There is something there Sidders, that you can believe in this stuff and not be critical about it. I dont know what it is, it must be your personality type, arrested development, a side that you have that is easily led.
An accident in childhood years, a bump on the head. It has led to your logic machinery being clogged, or lacking oil, that results in you wanting to enslave the world in something that is quite frankly, laughable, and has been shown to be so.
Is freedom not your cup of tea? Do you really think you know better?
I was listening to Andrew Neil on TV this morning and he was asked what he thought the direction the BBC was going.
He said they pandered to much to the young liberal metropolitan elite and ignored the rest of the country and its voters.
Quite interesting coming from one of the most experienced political commentators in the UK.
... yes, Andrew Neil ... far too sensible for the Leftwaffe ...