Selling Langstaff for a fee was inevitable.
Selling Nemane for a fee was a bonus.
Selling Crowley would require new owners silly money.
Printable View
Selling Langstaff for a fee was inevitable.
Selling Nemane for a fee was a bonus.
Selling Crowley would require new owners silly money.
You're right but if we're being brutally honest we can't be too overstocked if Chicksen is currently starting there. My logic was -
Jones - Feel like Maynard's plan is to play him further forward (Crowley role if he leaves?)
Tsaroulla - Already out injured which isn't a great start but you'd assume he's first choice at LWB if the above is correct
Chicksen - In my opinion should be 3rd choice and not even in the conversation to be in our starting 11
Would of thought he will be sold by tonight so they can register him to play tomorrow, only a thought.
Has anyone considered that he might want to move?
It wasn't so long ago that we would have been happy for any sort of fee for any player on the books
The fact that we now have players (and managers) that attract attention from teams higher up the pyramid is a sign of good ownership IMO.
I'd be disappointed if we lost Crowley in this window. I wouldn't pi55 my pants over it though, he was the replacement for RR who we thought was irreplaceable.
We are Notts County, we move on.
It would be a massive shame to lose Crowley and I'm not sure how he can be replaced tbh. However, if the bros think he can be and that the deal is good then so be it.
What i have a major issue with is losing him to MKDongs. We shouldn't be selling our best players to a promotion rival full stop. I'd rather lose him for nothing at the end of the season like Rodders.