re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonzosbest74
If it was numbers he would of reverted to type by now. Spelling, grammar, sentencing etc Even though I thought you lot gave numbers a hard time and were complete wan kers towards him I could see why to a certain degree. Where my stance was just to ignore him. Much better and so much more polite, so much more English if you ask me.
Ammer is at least more likeable and cant see why you all choose these bully boy tactics yet again
Thanks mate :)
All I can conclude is that there are many here that think a manager is to blame every time a team loses as it was that thread that upset them all. If they don't think that why they so upset as that's who my comments were aimed at.[/quote]
It wasn't that at all, go back and re-read all your posts from Saturday. . . . . .you came across as rude and arrogant. It's really no coincidence that at
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
I'm sorry it came across like that, it's not how I meant it . But realistically everyone's emotions were running high Saturday so most including myself where just venting.
That's all you really had to say mate.
You sounded as if you thought your football knowledge was superior to the rest of the posters but you've now said didn't mean it to come across in that manner.
It's not easy to strike the right tone when you're discussing something that you feel passionately about but as Mrs Bonzo always says . . . . . . pick your battles.
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
Oops...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
If people genuinely do believe that then my post is valid and I really think some have to start readjusting their viewpoint .
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
Utter nonsense. Not once have you told anyone what they should think.
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonzosbest74
I'm sorry it came across like that, it's not how I meant it . But realistically everyone's emotions were running high Saturday so most including myself where just venting.
My football knowledge is vastly superior!!:P
That's all you really had to say mate.
You sounded as if you thought your football knowledge was superior to the rest of the posters but you've now said didn't mean it to come across in that manner.
It's not easy to strike the right tone when you're discussing something that you feel passionately about but as Mrs Bonzo always says . . . . . . pick your battles.[/quote]
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by frogiron
Oops...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
If people genuinely do believe that then my post is valid and I really think some have to start readjusting their viewpoint .
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
Utter nonsense. Not once have you told anyone what they should think.
Thinking someone should adjust their viewpoint and telling someone to adjust their viewpoint are too different things.
Thinking your a p**** and telling you your a p**** is also two different things>;)
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
Oops...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
If people genuinely do believe that then my post is valid and I really think some have to start readjusting their viewpoint .
Quote:
Originally Posted by ammeread
Utter nonsense. Not once have you told anyone what they should think.
Thinking someone should adjust their viewpoint and telling someone to adjust their viewpoint are too different things.
Thinking your a p**** and telling you your a p**** is also two different things>;)[/quote]
Ahh.. that will be the same subtle method that you used to differentiate between "any time we lose" and "every time we lose" - apparently those two having completely different meanings in Ammereadworld
You clearly have much to teach us about the English language.
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonzosbest74
I thought you lot gave numbers a hard time and were complete wan kers towards him I could see why to a certain degree.
Deserved everything he got the moment he starting talking about my kids & wife mate. Complete c.unt and certainly doesn't deserve any mitigation.
The construction of ammereads posts would indicate he ain't 1491 but he's clearly fishing.[/quote]
I have no idea what he said about your wife and kids and whatever it was Im sure it was out of order.
Which is why my stance is talk to who you wish to talk to and ignore the ones you dont.
But that said I dont think I would take anything personally on here as no one knows me or my family so the worst anyone can do or say is just made up to get the maximum effect.
Its just words on a screen aimed at Herbie and not me personally
BTW Herbie is not me its someone I invented
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
"BTW Herbie is not me"
WHO IS HERBIE?
THE PUBLIC HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW!
re: Ammeread isn't Numbers
Quote:
Originally Posted by herbiehammer
I have no idea what he said about your wife and kids and whatever it was Im sure it was out of order.
Which is why my stance is talk to who you wish to talk to and ignore the ones you dont.
But that said I dont think I would take anything personally on here as no one knows me or my family so the worst anyone can do or say is just made up to get the maximum effect.
Its just words on a screen aimed at Herbie and not me personally
BTW Herbie is not me its someone I invented
My point was that he deserved everything he got but I know you used to ignore him which is a skill I've yet to acquire.
He is the only person on the site that I've ever called a c.unt and meant it. . . . . . . . . .you c.unt >:(