Interesting Comments From McCall...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by firparkloony

No offence intended, but this debate's an irrelevance IMO. He's gone.

---

With respect the original post was not seeking comment about his efforts for us, more why he would need to leave the Scotland post if he took the Rangers job which seemed to be his inference in the interview.[/quote]

Funny how in some cases when we deviate from the point, it becomes an "interesting debate" in others such as this the inference is "stick to the point I'm making" just wondering what is the correct protocol for deviation?[/quote]

You read more into my reply than was intended. I was making no inference to "stick to the point" any discussion is free to develop at it likes. I was merely pointing out to someone who seemed less than interested about discussing McCall as manager that subject was not the original point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mix106

No offence intended, but this debate's an irrelevance IMO. He's gone.

---

With respect the original post was not seeking comment about his efforts for us, more why he would need to leave the Scotland post if he took the Rangers job which seemed to be his inference in the interview.[/quote]

Funny how in some cases when we deviate from the point, it becomes an "interesting debate" in others such as this the inference is "stick to the point I'm making" just wondering what is the correct protocol for deviation?[/quote]

You read more into my reply than was intended. I was making no inference to "stick to the point" any discussion is free to develop at it likes. I was merely pointing out to someone who seemed less than interested about discussing McCall as manager that subject was not the original point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by firparkloony

No offence intended, but this debate's an irrelevance IMO. He's gone.

---

With respect the original post was not seeking comment about his efforts for us, more why he would need to leave the Scotland post if he took the Rangers job which seemed to be his inference in the interview.[/quote]

Funny how in some cases when we deviate from the point, it becomes an "interesting debate" in others such as this the inference is "stick to the point I'm making" just wondering what is the correct protocol for deviation?[/quote]

You read more into my reply than was intended. I was making no inference to "stick to the point" any discussion is free to develop at it likes. I was merely pointing out to someone who seemed less than interested about discussing McCall a

Guys - guys ! Calm down and pop the toys back in the prams - as I said in my original response;
No offence intended, but this debate's an irrelevance IMO. He's gone. :? :?

Keep
Calm
And
Support
The
'Well

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sieb1886

Guys - guys ! Calm down and pop the toys back in the prams - as I said in my original response;
No offence intended, but this debate's an irrelevance IMO. He's gone. :? :?

---

Im perfectly calm I aint accusing anyone of anything.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bheron

Keep
Calm
And
Support
The
'Well

---

They call me Cucumber...'cause am cool as!!!
'Mon the 'WELL