A Pub Quiz - Sort of....

Come on Scully. Haven't read the books or seen the films but just know it's a load of rubbish. Your usual open minded self then. :)
Bit like loving Ertl regardless of the evidence you have seen. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kernow

9. The Olde Cock Inn and The Whippet Inn are pubs from which innuendo laden series of films?

Carry On.........?

---

The Fawcett Inn used to be my local, titter ye not!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlueAdder

Come on Scully. Haven't read the books or seen the films but just know it's a load of rubbish. Your usual open minded self then. :)
Bit like loving Ertl regardless of the evidence you have seen. :)

---

No Bladds,I have seen Ertl play....and he is/was imperial.
Harry Potter....even the titles suggest a childlike quality...its like a 4 year old talking ......ffs Bladds...did you enjoy them then ?

Now the Hobbit....classic or what.

But Harry friggin Potter...come on...belongs to Jackanory.
Ok she has conned the general public...but you..I thought you had more intelligence

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Southerndown

9. The Olde Cock Inn and The Whippet Inn are pubs from which innuendo laden series of films?

Carry On.........?

---

The Fawcett Inn
Tillet
Herts

Yep,
bought and read all the Potter books and DVD's. Thought they were excellent and not juvenile at all. Still amazed you are dissing them when you have not read or watched the story.
Agree that the Tolkien books are also very good as were the films.
I think that the Potters and the Baggins are not too far apart as works of fiction. Tolkien clearly regarded as the more 'classic' of the two but suspect Rowling is by far the richer.

Don't need to read them when they are HP and the goblet of fire ffs.HP and the etc etc....Enid Blyton and the famous five by another.
According to wiki...juvenile literature

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlueAdder

Yep,
bought and read all the Potter books and DVD's. Thought they were excellent and not juvenile at all. Still amazed you are dissing them when you have not read or watched the story.
Agree that the Tolkien books are also very good as were the films.
I think that the Potters and the Baggins are not too far apart as works of fiction. Tolkien clearly regarded as the more 'classic' of the two but suspect Rowling is by far the richer.

---

Of course she's richer !? She's still alive.
No pockets in a shroud mate !

I really meant I suspect Potter has made more than Baggins in Book, TV and DVD, and Film sales.

Less of the argument and more of the Answers required here. :)

All a bit of sport eh Bladds.
No point every one agreeing with everyone.
We need thought provoking debate :heart:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Scoular1

Don't need to read them when they are HP and the goblet of fire ffs.

---

Soudy bought a copy thinking it was Harry Potter and the Gobbler of Fire. XD