XDQuote:
Originally Posted by Holden_C
Printable View
XDQuote:
Originally Posted by Holden_C
'Related Party Transactions', they are called, and UEFA can just put a line through them in the calculations. I guess this is one of the reasons Mike Ashley doesn't have 'Sports Direct' on Newcastle shirts.Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayBlade
You have to wonder about a business plan for funding a football club that relies on selling tickets for three years hence, and the Chairman starting-up a sports kit manufacturer that doesn't seem able to produce shirts in volume, a yet to be launched Energy Drink and a local Taxi firm, just so they can provide sponsorship? Is it just me or does all this look kinda wierd?
Well, trying to thwart FFP is a dirty business, and Booboo McCabe and the Prince will have to do something similar in the long run. How much money they've got isn't the issue. What they can spend is determined by the club's turnover, as I understand it. Mind you, that understanding could very well be flawed. Attachment 6033
Stop flirtin wi Marvin ya Floozy.:) UTCBQuote:
Originally Posted by Ayamonteblade
Squeezing inside the loopholes is one thing. This looks like 'Oh s***, We spent three years money in two seasons. It was promotion or bust, and we didn't get promotion. We're totally fecked. WTF do we do now??'Quote:
Originally Posted by LesHiboux
Gi oer!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by rodcurrie
Not wanting to lead you on you understand Aya but unlike the others on here, I am, a gentleman.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayamonteblade
:)
No it's to do with limiting losses over a three year period. Currently you can lose £39m in that time. You lost almost ten million in 2016 and had a much bigger wage bill last year. So you could already be well more than half way there.Quote:
Originally Posted by LesHiboux
Green eyed Rod?Quote:
Originally Posted by rodcurrie
He's stirring CH - must have finished his ironing early todayQuote:
Originally Posted by Holden_C