Pulis Out!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Whicka_Mon

Bunch of happy clappers.
Only joking folks.
Not jumping on the bandwagon yet. Changing my views on the bloke after two games would make me a hypocrite. However I am more than happy to be proved wrong every week.

---

Just got back and thought we played really well and Barry was excellent so was Hegazi who won every ball. So for the Pulis whingers - was Pulis negative in taking off McClean for Kanu - was he feck as this brought about an extra thrust and the goal!

Did you see it Chris from your dodgy stream? Strange also how almost 2,000 supporters were all singing Pulis' name throughout the game along with Sir Garry!

PS - next week, I would bring back Yacob and bench Field. For me - Field has potential but a passenger and not a starting player - not yet anyway, as needs championship experience!

Pulis and credit.

You're having a laugh.

This dinosaur should should be history by now.

He should have his feet up and be watching the flintstones, not managing top class footballers.

Don't forget it's 2 wins in 11.

You cannot hide from the facts.

Pulisaurus out!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baggieal

Just got back and thought we played really well and Barry was excellent so was Hegazi who won every ball. So for the Pulis whingers - was Pulis negative in taking off McClean for Kanu - was he feck as this brought about an extra thrust and the goal!

Did you see it Chris from your dodgy stream? Strange also how almost 2,000 supporters were all singing Pulis' name throughout the game along with Sir Garry!

PS - next week, I would bring back Yacob and bench Field. For me - Field has potential but a passenger and not a starting player - not yet anyway, as needs championship experience!

---

I saw it, though had to go round my mates as my computer malfunctioned yesterday morning and my Amazon stick couldn't get a link. Missed the first 15 minutes. On the plus side he makes good home brew beer.
As for the game; it's always great to win but if Burnley had taken their 2 gilt edged chances and we'd lost then it would have been the fault of Pulis's tactics. We are defending well, Foster has yet to be tested in either game.
We need to appeal the sending off. Over reaction by another millionaire conned the ref.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by holmleighchris

I saw it, though had to go round my mates as my computer malfunctioned yesterday morning and my Amazon stick couldn't get a link. Missed the first 15 minutes. On the plus side he makes good home brew beer.
As for the game; it's always great to win but if Burnley had taken their 2 gilt edged chances and we'd lost then it would have been the fault of Pulis's tactics. We are defending well, Foster has yet to be tested in either game.
We need to appeal the sending off. Over reaction by another millionaire conned the ref.

---

Get another computer. It was Pulis who took off McClean to give more forward thrust by the introduction of Kanu and then the goal came. Oh, I forgot that was negative and when Kanu went off - Rondon came on so again was that negative. There are some who don't post on here because of the sheer negativity!

Six points from two games is fantastic so give credit where it's due. The 2,000 who went to the match did to Pulis and the team!!!!

FFS!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baggieal

Get another computer. It was Pulis who took off McClean to give more forward thrust by the introduction of Kanu and then the goal came. Oh, I forgot that was negative and when Kanu went off - Rondon came on so again was that negative. There are some who don't post on here because of the sheer negativity!

Six points from two games is fantastic so give credit where it's due. The 2,000 who went to the match did to Pulis and the team!!!!

FFS!

---

Did you read my post? Did it not seem the sentence about if we had lost it was Pulis's fault was a little tongue in cheek?
Weary sigh1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baggieal

Get another computer. It was Pulis who took off McClean to give more forward thrust by the introduction of Kanu and then the goal came. Oh, I forgot that was negative and when Kanu went off - Rondon came on so again was that negative. There are some who don't post on here because of the sheer negativity!

Six points from two games is fantastic so give credit where it's due. The 2,000 who went to the match did to Pulis and the team!!!!

FFS!

---

Of course your posts towards the chairman are never negative are they? Not only negative but you throw every racial stereotype towards Chinese people into them.

I heard Megson's name a few times, but the Pulis songs must have been sung with a whisper.
Pulis must be very deluded if he takes any credit for the 3 very welcome points, which just might keep us up. We rarely ventured into the Burnley half of the field, and although we once strung 4 passes together, the intent was never there until someone in the crowd advised that "if we can't get 3 points today, we'll never stay up". Megson said "She's got a good point there, Tone. Let's go for it".
And thus HRK came on - not for the anonymous space-markers Field or Livermore, but for the hard-working McClean. (I actually thought McClean must have been injured, but he showed enough disgust to be left out for the next month or 2).
In truth, all of the team's aard graft could have been in vain simply because a woefully poor Burnley missed 4 or 5 great chances. If they'd taken two of them, Albion would have got what they deserved: bugger-all.

That's the spirit talksaft.

Pulisaurus out.

Put him the natural history museum in London.

Better still put him on trial at the Hague for crimes against football.

What's all this wanting players to work all about?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BaggieBlood

That's the spirit talksaft.

Pulisaurus out.

Put him the natural history museum in London.

Better still put him on trial at the Hague for crimes against football.

What's all this wanting players to work all about?

---

Ha ha ha brilliant. Proper med me loff.
Didn't go to or watch the game. I listened to the commentary with Bomber on WM. They actually said that the substitution we did in the second half was the only thing we had done til that point.
So lets give our Tone credit for the substitution then ignore his baffling decision to put J Rod on the wing last week thus nullifying any threat we had after he was having shots in in the first half.
Swings and roundabouts ay it? Still can't argue with results so far. But I still think it's unsustainable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Whicka_Mon

Ha ha ha brilliant. Proper med me loff.
Didn't go to or watch the game. I listened to the commentary with Bomber on WM. They actually said that the substitution we did in the second half was the only thing we had done til that point.
So lets give our Tone credit for the substitution then ignore his baffling decision to put J Rod on the wing last week thus nullifying any threat we had after he was having shots in in the first half.
Swings and roundabouts ay it? Still can't argue with results so far. But I still think it's unsustainable.

---

Thought we were solid Whicka and both Barry and Hegazi were excellent. It's OK for Burnley to moan - but did Foster have anything to save? There's the two fingers to them. Credit to Pulis - the substitution was attacking - Kanu for McClean and it got us the goal! No reason why it can't continue with a couple of quality additions and the three injured coming back. Pulis whether you like him or not deserves huge credit - six points is fantastic!