murdering your darlings

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Silly-miller

I think proctor and Moore worked well together but once proctor got injured (horrifically) Moore just didn’t get the same results I guess partnerships are important. I think we are also seeing ball and smith forming a partnership too that’s why we look so dam good now

---

Moore only played 3 league games with Proctor and scored another 9 goals after his injury, I think his results were very good without Proctor!

With regards to the opening post, I don't think we're a better team because he's gone, we're a better team because we've changed the system. Moore could have easily played the same role that Smith is, and probably done it even better. That's not a criticism of Smith, I like him and think he's done great since he's been here, but Moore was a class above in my opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Masbroughstreet

Moore only played 3 league games with Proctor and scored another 9 goals after his injury, I think his results were very good without Proctor! .

---

Good yes but I think he could have scored Moore if proctor didn’t get injured. We will never know

As for who’s better i still think smith is as good as when we first got Moore. I won’t compair them both as they are now because Moore has had more game time than Smith.

I

I was surprised with the fitness of Smiffy and his eye for goal and think it was a good replacement for Moore that I wouldnt change.

No point comparing Moore and Smith yet. Moore played 20 times for us and Smith has only just arrived.
The early signs are promising but let's give him a decent run of games before rushing to judgement.