Tom Pearce....

Fantastic news and great potential for us. Well pleased and shows good intent on both sides for me

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jimmybn

Not like WTF to exaggerate :) Anything old rubbish to spit on one of our own (again).

Thought this would have been a positive thread and yet tarnished once again by the neg head general. Have a day off WTF for gods sake....

Great news the lad has signed up. Hopefully he can continue his impressive start and nail down that position for years to come.

---

As per normal Mavo, anything to criticise a post of mine. Predictable is becoming your second name.

Billy was on the right lines, and I agree that anything that protects a potential asset is to be welcomed. The nature/length of Sackos contract is surely secondary to the fact (insanity), that he has one in the first place? (waits in vain for a sensible answer from the in-house sycophant).

Wtf did you not spot Billy.'s slight touch of imitative irony?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jezleeds

Wtf did you not spot Billy.'s slight touch of imitative irony?

---

He's not the sharpest tool in the box. Blinded by negativity :/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jezleeds

Wtf did you not spot Billy.'s slight touch of imitative irony?

---

Struck me as being a fairly straightforward, accurate post.

Err.....I agreed the signing was a good one, whatever the reasons. Shame we pi55ed about before getting something fairly obvious out of the way, contrast the largesse extended to the likes of Sacko (unless of course you think that was a good thing?).

Still waiting for an answer to my previous post, funny that! I'll not hold my breath.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WTF11

Err.....I agreed the signing was a good one, whatever the reasons. Shame we pi55ed about before getting something fairly obvious out of the way, contrast the largesse extended to the likes of Sacko (unless of course you think that was a good thing?).

Still waiting for an answer to my previous post, funny that! I'll not hold my breath.

---

What pissing about?

We offered him a contract in may before the current one expired.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CromerWhite

What pissing about?

We offered him a contract in may before the current one expired.

---

Dont expect an answer Cromer - he would rather switch this Tom Pearce thread into a hate filled thread about Sacko or anything else that he can moan about and bore everyone senseless (again)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WTF11

As per normal Mavo, anything to criticise a post of mine. Predictable is becoming your second name.

Billy was on the right lines, and I agree that anything that protects a potential asset is to be welcomed. The nature/length of Sackos contract is surely secondary to the fact (insanity), that he has one in the first place? (waits in vain for a sensible answer from the in-house sycophant).

---

It's a funny thing but I was watching the win over Villa at ER under Monk, and Sacko had an excellent game, really made a difference to our attack that night, so he's clearly got some potential. Maybe it was more the case this year that TC and Heck were clueless about how to get the best out of him ?

Taff I'm of the opinion that if sacko and ekuban are coached properly they can become decent players