Originally Posted by
trinitoon
No, we are not. Attendances do not make a club big.
Historic reputation does not make a club big. Our name is known by football fans of a certain age internationally for historic exploits but this does not make a club "big".
You'd have to go back 15-20 years to find anything resembling "nearly-men" success. But the success that everyone commenting above is brushing under the carpet is key to the definition of big.
You've got to tick many of these boxes:
• Have a rich and storied history
• Spend big regularly
• Have a massive attendance in a big stadium
• Have a massive domestic and overseas following (not just the names Keegan and Shearer ringing a small bell)
• Win cups and leagues or be in the frame to win things a few times a decade
• Have significant turnover
• Be a place that footballers want to come
• Take part in the premier continental cups regularly
• Be respected and command respect for footballing reasons within the current decade
A good indication of whether you are a big club is gauging the reaction of fans that are not from your club (or bitter rivals) when asking if yours is a big club.
With the right ownership, Newcastle can be one of the biggest. But we'd have to do more than talk about attendances, point at greying (or balding) giants of yesteryear and reminisce to claim to be big.
Newcastle was a big club. It no longer is.