Your right BT all good until it’s not , Dyche kept - keeps us in the league not the board
And they won’t slate him because guess what we’re still in that league and the money’s rolling in.
Dyche is the key and his staff of course
Printable View
You obviously misinterpreted what I wrote army, "He works with them not against them and not once have I ever read or heard any moaning or criticism of his employers from the man.
"Incredible tosh", and all I said was that we are competing in the PL because of Sean Dyche. I would love to be alongside you BT when you tell Mr Dyche to his face that any suggestion that he is responsible for our success is incredible tosh. Let me know when you're available and I'll see if I can get us an appointment. >;)
Let me ask you this then BT, purely hypothetical of course. You come into some seriously big money, you decide to buy a small club and take it up the divisions, perhaps even saving Bury, something like that. You have a choice, you can have Mike Garlick to run it, or Sean Dyche as manager, but not both, it's one or the other. Which would you choose ?
Attachment 13537
He would then appoint Dyche as manager!
Like I said sinkov, chicken or egg?
Although there are times when I am disappointed with Sean Dyche's tactics. He is and has been a great manager for Burnley FC. I am unable to comment on the board's transfer dealings as I have not enough information on the available finances for the transfer budget. I have only met one member of the board, but I was unimpressed with him and hope that the others are better suited to the task of running a football club. However having listened to Mike Garlick over the time he has been chairman he does appear to be more positive in his words than in the end product when it comes to transfer dealings.