Originally Posted by
swaledale
So what your saying rA is if a player who is earning more in a week than some fans earn in 6 months or a year, the fans shouldnt express their displeasure because the poor little diddums confidence might be knocked?
Really? If they haven't got what it takes to play in front of a crowd, many of whom, especially opposition fans will be hostile, then IMO they should stick to earning £500 a week in non league as they clearly haven't go what it takes to play at a higher level!
If your prepared to take the relatively high wages you know your playing (normally) in front of a crowd of thousands of people, who are "instant experts" and will give verbals if you play badly.
Personally other than the odd groan or shout of exasperation I'm not one for giving verbals to an individual player, but thats been the case with football for many years - Cantona was given foul personal abuse rather than criticism incidentally.
Its trite to say the "boo boys" have dented their form, the plain fact is they are inconsistent players, the real reasons range from they are not good enough, they aren't single minded enough, they dont work hard enough, they are distracted by boozing, gambling etc, they aren't played in their best position, they don't like, get on with the manager, the tactics don't suit them etc.
Yes they may be a "confidence player" but if the crowd makes them play badly, then they clearly aren't cut out for a career in professional football.
It has ever been the case that football fans provide verbal approval or disapproval of a player and teams performance, if one or the other is consistently crap then the fans will let them know it (or at least a certain section will).