You must have been furious then when ‘Boris’ sent Rees Mogg up to Scotland to lie to Her Maj, and also when ‘Boris’ and his pals were on the piss while she was burying her husband?Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePass
You must have been furious then when ‘Boris’ sent Rees Mogg up to Scotland to lie to Her Maj, and also when ‘Boris’ and his pals were on the piss while she was burying her husband?Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePass
I think we all lost. Think empty supermarket shelves and much higher prices.Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePass
Again, nearly all of us lost. Unless of course you 'won' a contract to supply dodgy PPE.Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePass
We might differ on that one.Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePass
For the sake of our nation, we might differ even more on that one!Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePass
It was a simple question. But of course I have the advantage as we get a vote next month. You won't.Quote:
Originally Posted by BanjoPie
You are clearly a fan of the monarchy Banjo, so let me ask you two questions:Quote:
Originally Posted by BanjoPie
Are you happy that the queen was escorted by someone who has been accused of abusing under age girls?
I am aware he was accused rather than convicted, but do you think that was down to his vast wealth more than his innocence?
DittoQuote:
Originally Posted by BanjoPie
But it was this sort of *******s that caused me to leave. Along with stupid people voting for corrupt Eton Boys and expecting their lives to improve and then Brexit. So my views are valid on the subject.Quote:
Originally Posted by i961pie
So now Rishi Sunak is pretending to be the injured party:
"Rishi Sunak has said he finds it "very upsetting" that his wife has faced criticism over shares she owns in a tech company operating in Russia. The chancellor compared his feelings to those of film star Will Smith, whose own wife was mocked at the Oscars. But he joked: "At least I didn't get up and slap anybody, which is good." Mr Sunak's wife Akshata Murty owns shares thought to be worth more than £400m in Indian firm Infosys, founded by her father, Narayana".
So Rishi, we want to hit the Russians hard, unless your wife happens to have a massive fortune operating from there. You must be devastated, maybe someone can start a crowdfunder page to help you through this trauma.
Further to this, Rishi Sunak's wife has now decided to pay UK taxes on her overseas income despite her husband claiming she had been "unfairly smeared" for previously avoiding it. I wonder what caused her to change her mind? Was it a moral decision because she realised it didn't sit comfortably with her husband pretending to care about the damage the cost of living crisis is doing to millions of hard working families, or was she shamed into doing it simply because her legal but utterly immoral tax evasion became public?Quote:
Originally Posted by Elite_Pie
Is there any real hardship in paying a couple of million in tax on 'earnings' of ten million?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elite_Pie
I shall answer both questions in a statement that I believe to be true:
Of course Andrew had xes with that girl - there were even messages sent by her to her friends saying that she went to bed with him. The photo is genuine, that cannot be denied but just think about it, at the time he had xes with her, he was a fairly young single guy (separated or divorced) - he met a very attractive young girl who to be fair looked a lot older than 17 so he probably didn’t give a thought about her being under age so, without any doubt I as far as I believe he did have xes with her.
What he did was no more than most of the men on this board would have done (if they are honest - did they check the girls birth certificate) the biggest mistake he made was following the instructions of the lawyers who advised him “you never even met this girl - deny it at all cost”. Had he have come clean and told the truth (despite his so-called legal advice) and said “yes, I did have xes with her, it never even occurred to me she was under age (only in that US state or perhaps a few others?)
Had he have ignored the stupid advice from his lawyers, he would have been able to use the ‘evidence’ of her friend receiving messages saying ‘I got prince Andrew into bed’. Had this have been the case, most people would just have called him ‘Randy Andy” and that would have been the end of the matter. In the end he had to pay the £9m to make the episode go away as it was taking centre stage over the Queens Jubilee year.
Regards Her Majesty having Andrew as her escort, why shouldn’t she, he was her son, Prince Philip was his dad and she probably knows the truth and also about the bad advice.
Thats my take on it. “Long live the Queen and the Monarchy”
Quote:
Originally Posted by BanjoPie
Hear hear.