Originally Posted by
Monaco_Totty
Radz has No option, now.
Suppose it's a positive 'gee-up' for our senior pro's to have a say in matters of playing style for a short while but long term as JM found out - only one gaffer to call the shots popular or not.
Radz alone messed this up (his decision) as when reviewing 'others' decision making prognosis the reviewer (Radz) should have taken into account the dilemmas or emergencies that the other decision makers had faced.
For me, the standard expected of risk decisions should be consistent with what would be expected from a 'similar rank' (Owner) of experience of the same circumstances.
That's what happens daily were I work for sure.
Personally for me - the best way to understand any position is to ask what "assumptions" would make it a rational decision.
Any then any "presumption" if taken is only an idea that is taken to be true on the basis of probability.
So if you understand yourself & understand your enemy then you need't fear any battles ahead appears to be Radz attitude on "probable" Coaching appointments.
Looking closely at Radz 'other business acquisitions & mergers of late, he showed a strong structured merger communications strategy - ***** to clarify what comes next in any business merger - so what's the prob at Leeds ?
At Leeds Radz appears to struggle in separating fact from fiction with constant dependence on usage of the LUFC internal communications personnel & it appears to me that trusted senior employees hold different perceptions about player 'acquisitions' based lately on LUFC partner attractiveness & target responsiveness.
So those 'differing-perceptions' will only make employees perceive the acquisitions as an opportunity or a threat. Radz as the owner should have been more aware of all perceptions & have taken them into account when crafting his strategy for recent internal LUFC communication, IMO.
Embarrassing to be honest & revolves around the LUFC valuation used in last round of financing - me thinks.
