You don't become a bad player overnight. SM tactics & style of play after Xmas has a lot to answer for. There's a reason we **** the nest to get promotedQuote:
Originally Posted by kill_the_drum
Printable View
You don't become a bad player overnight. SM tactics & style of play after Xmas has a lot to answer for. There's a reason we **** the nest to get promotedQuote:
Originally Posted by kill_the_drum
Where did I say he?s a bad player?Quote:
Originally Posted by irishpete
I?m saying his form leading up to Jan, and the fact that clubs act more desperately in Jan would be why we?d possibly see bigger offers.
He?s had a good season but 19 goals isn?t setting the league alight at a club that finished in the top 6.
I agree that our style of play was changed after Crowley left and it didn?t suit Jatta. But whoever you blame for that, it showed anyone watching that he?s not the best with his back to goal and is easily dominated by league 2 defenders.
He?s also 26! That?s not old but it?s hitting your peak with not many years left of physical development.
I don?t think he?ll go for ?500k because I don?t think anyone will pay that, but I certainly don?t think he?s a bad player!
Somebody just messaged me an article from Facebook saying the Doncaster have agreed the deal and that a medical has been scheduled?
I know his form has dipped but the way we keep selling players is getting a bit silly IMHO.
If you believe articles that are shared on Facebook as gospel, I have some magic beans you might be interested in.Quote:
Originally Posted by Med Pie
Exactly the same site reporting this last year said Langstaff is going to Swansea.Quote:
Originally Posted by northpie1862
Fee agreed, wages agreed and medical booked.
Sounds like this site is ran by a chancer of course if you make alot of predictions you will be right every so often & its how these sites get followers/clicks.
XDQuote:
Originally Posted by northpie1862
As for Jatta I don?t us to sell him. He?s good. Yes his form tailed off more than most when the team struggled for form, however he?s scoring a goal every other game for the club. He finished the leagues second top scorer. If he?s not setting the league alight then who is 33 year old Michael Cheek only? In the whole Legaue?
You have to play to his strengths evidently but when we did there was no better forward in the league last season bar loanee Lowe.
If he did leave and it was for ?500K that?s another very tidy profit made and surely a good proportion would be reinvested in a replacement.
Where did I say or even suggest that I believed it?Quote:
Originally Posted by northpie1862
You'll see that I finished the line with '?', perhaps you need to learn what that means..........
So you don't believe it, but posted it anyway, when we knew it wasn't remotely trueQuote:
Originally Posted by Med Pie