Originally Posted by
AucklandRover
Ridiculous. What's your solution? Change manager now? Play all our attacking players at once? Oh no, that's no good - we have a poor defence! Play extra defenders? No - we need to attack, attack, attack!
Your reaction to one defeat is completely over the top.
If we win at the weekend and the other two leaders don't, there will be some fans talking as if the job's done again. It won't be. That's why over-reacting to every set-back is as misguided as counting your chickens. (No pun intended!)
By the way, how do I see that we have the best squad in the League just by looking at it? Besides, a good team is sometimes more than the sum of its parts, anyway. Putting the best XI players on the pitch doesn't necessarily create the most effective team.
Football is not simplistic. Those who say, "If we'd played Payne instead of Conway, everything would have been different" are simply p*ssing into the wind.
If success in football is as simple as the "experts" in the crowd make out, why do so many managers fail?
I'm not being cavalier, but jumping up and down, shouting "Sack the manager" is going to solve nothing.
We aren't gelling every week. Does that mean when we do, it's all because TM has said one thing, and when we don't, it's because he's said another?
And please tell me you don't believe that Conway is so terrible, the other ten who'd played so well a few days before couldn't cope with his presence and couldn't make up for his inadequacies.
As for the financial side, we were told that leaving the Championship meant ruin. It didn't. Clubs tend to survive, and - as Shrewsbury are showing - success isn't just about money.
Finally, to go back to the opening line, what's your magic solution, anyway?