Quote:
Originally Posted by Albionic68
68 - thought you had better standards mate! Corbyn may have done a 2 for 1 with old ma Abbott!!!
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albionic68
68 - thought you had better standards mate! Corbyn may have done a 2 for 1 with old ma Abbott!!!
I've got standards Al' but there's nothing wrong in letting them dip once in a while.Quote:
Originally Posted by baggieal
They'd never fall as low as Diane Abbottopotamus though.
Corbyn must have one hell of a constitution, that or zero standards whatsoever (who would've thunk it.......?) .
Miller's on her third husband 68 so there might be time for you yet. Just don't ask her about the financial business her and her husband run that hasn't made a profit since it was formed in 2008. Or the law degree she claimed both on her web site and publicity material to have but doesn't then blamed it on a copywriting error or her previous husband getting investigated for financial irregularities or The Charity Commission calling her a publicity seeker for the way she acted when running her charity.....apart from that you should get on just fine old chapQuote:
Originally Posted by Albionic68
Cheers for the tips '39 but I've no desire to hold her interviews >;) .Quote:
Originally Posted by stripes39
The reason it’s at the Supreme Court is that they say Johnson only prorogued Parliament to hide his ulterior aim. I think they need to be up before the beak themselves as they obviously have only brought the case to court to hide their ulterior aim .