SE did thank us in his post match interview for missing the other 23 shots or he would have been really embarrassed XD
Printable View
Yes but the Gills had something like nine players who were injured so whilst we certainly did the job it's perhaps not the best barometer of how good we are.
The Portsmouth and Sunderland matches were though
So beating half decent sides like Plymouth 2-0, Sunderland 5-1, Portsmouth 4-1, Ipswich 2-0, MK Dons 3-0 account for nothing, or didn't you watch these games. Lost to a late goal at Wigan when we deserved a point, a point against Wycombe and a point against Oxford, all half decent sides. Top scorers, best defence. Bizarre to say the least.
Back on topic, Cambridge away has a banana skin feel to me. Looked decent at our place.
From the top 10 we've played 9 of them.
Lost ...2
Drawn..2
Won...5
Those stats are none too shabby.
Playing one against one at the back will make us vulnerable, which is why it's a good job we're scoring plenty at the other end.
It will be a tough game for sure. If I recall correctly in one of our Championship relegation seasons they were rock bottom but still did the double over us, so maybe a bit of a bogey team?
I certainly hope complacency doesn't creep into our game, we have to treat every team as a serious threat and play at our best. We do that and we can beat any team in this league. We've been treated to months of great performances and results, lets keep it going. UTM
As discussed at length previously, unless you can prove that slipping on a banana skin is an actual occurrence and not just a figment of cartoon strip writers imagination can you please refrain from using it on here. Slipping on a dog turd is a much more likely real world event (or if you live in Seattle on a human turd) ;D